<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to bugs</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ballisticslib/bugs/</link><description>Recent changes to bugs</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/ballisticslib/bugs/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 05:20:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/ballisticslib/bugs/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The WindageMOA calculation is incorrect</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ballisticslib/bugs/1/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;There was an error in the WindageMOA calculation.  It was producing very bad res&lt;br /&gt;
ults.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Change the equation from:&lt;br /&gt;
ptr[10*n+5]=RadtoMOA(atan(ptr[10*n+4]));   // Windage in MOA&lt;br /&gt;
to:&lt;br /&gt;
ptr[10*n+5]=RadtoMOA(atan(ptr[10*n+4]/(12*x)));    // Windage in MOA&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This produces meaningful results.  The former equation didn't make sense.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkD</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 05:20:50 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net00ca3a73bb21471a5506b5ef3d48e2dbf347fe18</guid></item></channel></rss>