<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to 10: Type mismatch on Set operation</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/cloudbase/bugs/10/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/cloudbase/bugs/10/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/cloudbase/bugs/10/</id><updated>2009-06-08T06:17:30Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to 10: Type mismatch on Set operation</subtitle><entry><title>Type mismatch on Set operation</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/cloudbase/bugs/10/" rel="alternate"/><published>2009-06-08T06:17:30Z</published><updated>2009-06-08T06:17:30Z</updated><author><name>YoungWoo Kim</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/warwithin/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netfb7b89ab0332f38c66e444643d7348d76cfa60cc</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;As of now, CloudBase ignores type mismatch on set operation such as UNION, UNION ALL ...,&lt;br /&gt;
In my opinion, CB should return an exception about that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>