<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to bugs</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/codebook/bugs/</link><description>Recent changes to bugs</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/codebook/bugs/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:02:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/codebook/bugs/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>bug in refreshEofBofFlags in CdataBehavior</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/codebook/bugs/1/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I believe there is a bug in the refresheofbofflags&lt;br /&gt;
method in the cdatabehavior container.  In the&lt;br /&gt;
OTHERWISE of the second do case,  I believe there&lt;br /&gt;
should be a tlBOF = .F. before the SKIP in the IF BOF()&lt;br /&gt;
ELSE ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Every other place in this routine, the flags are set&lt;br /&gt;
.T. or .F. in pairs, except in this one.  The result is&lt;br /&gt;
that if you were on BOF, and are now not, the flag&lt;br /&gt;
doesn't get reset.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;June Kendrick&lt;br /&gt;
junk349@netscape.net&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:02:45 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netd3c564590ddc3b7fd39a9c9f2e8ea0382e0e283c</guid></item></channel></rss>