<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to Case Study Efficiency with JET Emitter templates</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/codegenjava/news/2008/08/case-study-efficiency-with-jet-emitter-templates/</link><description>Recent changes to Case Study Efficiency with JET Emitter templates</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/codegenjava/news/2008/08/case-study-efficiency-with-jet-emitter-templates/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:48:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/codegenjava/news/2008/08/case-study-efficiency-with-jet-emitter-templates/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Case Study Efficiency with JET Emitter templates</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/codegenjava/news/2008/08/case-study-efficiency-with-jet-emitter-templates/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recent development (in the upcoming 0.9.4) has shown that you have to invest about four times the amount of time to produce a JET emitter template as you would have to if you program the class by itself. Therefore if you have to produce a class based on the same principle more than four times you are more efficient using a JET emitter template.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sahits GmbH</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:48:05 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netd4af789a61b6b95e4b311e3dd15df381c3afe567</guid></item></channel></rss>