devil-linux-develop Mailing List for Devil-Linux (Page 14)

Here you are:

ftp://olga.mooo.com/DL_64/scripts.tar.bz2
ftp://olga.mooo.com/DL_64/packages.list

Serge

On 11/17/2010 06:05 AM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> Hey,
>
> just the scripts and a list of files you're using should be enough.
>
> Heiko
>
> Quoting Serge Leschinsky<ser...@gm...>:
>
>> Hm.... scripts with sources or just scripts?
>> I tried to keep everything in form of patches, so I guess it's
>> better to upload
>> everything. Expected size is about 1G.
>>
>> I need some time to clean it up from my mess. Hopefully, it will be
>> done tonight.
>>
>> Serge
>>
>>
>> On 11/16/2010 02:50 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>>> I was actually hoping to use the Gentoo security patches, which should
>>> make our life a bit easier.
>>> Could you upload your scripts so I can take a look at the 64 bit stuff?
>>> I have a couple of ideas which you probably already implemented. ;-)
>>>
>>> Otherwise I agree with your statement, it's probably best to give the
>>> new glibc a shot.
>>> I'll do some more testing and then upload it.
>>>
>>> Heiko
>>>
>>> Quoting Serge Leschinsky<ser...@gm...>:
>>>
>>>> Heiko,
>>>>
>>>> I think we should migrate to updated lfssytem eventually. However,
>>>> it will take
>>>> some time to adapt all current scripts and packages. I'd rather
>>>> update glibc in
>>>> 1.4 (in order to update dovecot) then freeze 1.4 (open for for
>>>> bugfixes/security
>>>> updates only) and start building/using new lfssystem for 1.5.
>>>>
>>>> Probably we will be able to merge DL and DL_64 at this point at least for
>>>> sources (for now  I use the toolchain with gcc-4.5.1, glibc-2.12,
>>>> binutils-2.20.51.tar.bz2 (it's snapshot 2.20 actually) ).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Serge
>>>>
>>>> On 11/16/2010 06:04 AM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>>>>> No opinions on this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Heiko
>>>>>
>>>>> Quoting Heiko Zuerker<he...@zu...>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey, I just added glibc 2.10.1 to a test compile, with dovecot 2.0.7 and
>>>>>> a couple of other updates. I?m looking for opinions if we should
>>>>>> ?backport? this to DL
>>>>>> 1.4, or only make it available in the Dev version (1.5.x). --
>>>>>> Regards    Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
>>>> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2&   L3.
>>>> Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
>>>> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
>>>> Dev...@li...
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
>> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2&  L3.
>> Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
>> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
>> Dev...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>>
>
>
>

Here you are:

sed -i "/^#include.*<sys\/time.h>/a\#include <limits.h>" usl/usl_timer.c || exit 
1

I also have a patch for it, but it seems to be necessary only for x64 arch.

Serge

PS. Sorry, I'm still not ready to upload sources and scripts :(

On 11/17/2010 08:08 AM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> Hey,
>
> is anybody using ippool ?
> Its compilation breaks with the new glibc and I couldn't find a patch yet.
> Just wondering how much effort I need to put in it.
>

Hey,

is anybody using ippool ?
Its compilation breaks with the new glibc and I couldn't find a patch yet.
Just wondering how much effort I need to put in it.

-- 

Regards
   Heiko Zuerker
   http://www.devil-linux.org


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Thanks for the info!

Heiko

Quoting Andrzej Odyniec <an...@ma...>:

> Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>> No opinions on this?
>
> I have not opinion. But I can give my experience.
>
> I updated glibc several months ago, when I connected Asterisk and  
> companion to
> DL. From this time on my router, MTA and VoIP production servers all is
> working with this glibc and is working fine. But ofcourse, I'm not using all
> packages.
>
> Regards
>
> Andrzej Odyniec
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
> Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>



-- 

Regards
   Heiko Zuerker
   http://www.devil-linux.org


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> No opinions on this?

I have not opinion. But I can give my experience.

I updated glibc several months ago, when I connected Asterisk and companion to 
DL. From this time on my router, MTA and VoIP production servers all is 
working with this glibc and is working fine. But ofcourse, I'm not using all 
packages.

Regards

Andrzej Odyniec

Hey,

just the scripts and a list of files you're using should be enough.

Heiko

Quoting Serge Leschinsky <ser...@gm...>:

> Hm.... scripts with sources or just scripts?
> I tried to keep everything in form of patches, so I guess it's  
> better to upload
> everything. Expected size is about 1G.
>
> I need some time to clean it up from my mess. Hopefully, it will be  
> done tonight.
>
> Serge
>
>
> On 11/16/2010 02:50 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>> I was actually hoping to use the Gentoo security patches, which should
>> make our life a bit easier.
>> Could you upload your scripts so I can take a look at the 64 bit stuff?
>> I have a couple of ideas which you probably already implemented. ;-)
>>
>> Otherwise I agree with your statement, it's probably best to give the
>> new glibc a shot.
>> I'll do some more testing and then upload it.
>>
>> Heiko
>>
>> Quoting Serge Leschinsky<ser...@gm...>:
>>
>>> Heiko,
>>>
>>> I think we should migrate to updated lfssytem eventually. However,
>>> it will take
>>> some time to adapt all current scripts and packages. I'd rather
>>> update glibc in
>>> 1.4 (in order to update dovecot) then freeze 1.4 (open for for
>>> bugfixes/security
>>> updates only) and start building/using new lfssystem for 1.5.
>>>
>>> Probably we will be able to merge DL and DL_64 at this point at least for
>>> sources (for now  I use the toolchain with gcc-4.5.1, glibc-2.12,
>>> binutils-2.20.51.tar.bz2 (it's snapshot 2.20 actually) ).
>>>
>>>
>>> Serge
>>>
>>> On 11/16/2010 06:04 AM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>>>> No opinions on this?
>>>>
>>>> Heiko
>>>>
>>>> Quoting Heiko Zuerker<he...@zu...>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey, I just added glibc 2.10.1 to a test compile, with dovecot 2.0.7 and
>>>>> a couple of other updates. I?m looking for opinions if we should
>>>>> ?backport? this to DL
>>>>> 1.4, or only make it available in the Dev version (1.5.x). --
>>>>> Regards    Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
>>> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2&  L3.
>>> Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
>>> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
>>> Dev...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
> Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>



-- 

Regards
   Heiko Zuerker
   http://www.devil-linux.org


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Hm.... scripts with sources or just scripts?
I tried to keep everything in form of patches, so I guess it's better to upload 
everything. Expected size is about 1G.

I need some time to clean it up from my mess. Hopefully, it will be done tonight.

Serge


On 11/16/2010 02:50 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> I was actually hoping to use the Gentoo security patches, which should
> make our life a bit easier.
> Could you upload your scripts so I can take a look at the 64 bit stuff?
> I have a couple of ideas which you probably already implemented. ;-)
>
> Otherwise I agree with your statement, it's probably best to give the
> new glibc a shot.
> I'll do some more testing and then upload it.
>
> Heiko
>
> Quoting Serge Leschinsky<ser...@gm...>:
>
>> Heiko,
>>
>> I think we should migrate to updated lfssytem eventually. However,
>> it will take
>> some time to adapt all current scripts and packages. I'd rather
>> update glibc in
>> 1.4 (in order to update dovecot) then freeze 1.4 (open for for
>> bugfixes/security
>> updates only) and start building/using new lfssystem for 1.5.
>>
>> Probably we will be able to merge DL and DL_64 at this point at least for
>> sources (for now  I use the toolchain with gcc-4.5.1, glibc-2.12,
>> binutils-2.20.51.tar.bz2 (it's snapshot 2.20 actually) ).
>>
>>
>> Serge
>>
>> On 11/16/2010 06:04 AM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>>> No opinions on this?
>>>
>>> Heiko
>>>
>>> Quoting Heiko Zuerker<he...@zu...>:
>>>
>>>> Hey, I just added glibc 2.10.1 to a test compile, with dovecot 2.0.7 and
>>>> a couple of other updates. I?m looking for opinions if we should
>>>> ?backport? this to DL
>>>> 1.4, or only make it available in the Dev version (1.5.x). --
>>>> Regards    Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
>> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2&  L3.
>> Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
>> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
>> Dev...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>>
>
>
>

I was actually hoping to use the Gentoo security patches, which should  
make our life a bit easier.
Could you upload your scripts so I can take a look at the 64 bit stuff?
I have a couple of ideas which you probably already implemented. ;-)

Otherwise I agree with your statement, it's probably best to give the  
new glibc a shot.
I'll do some more testing and then upload it.

Heiko

Quoting Serge Leschinsky <ser...@gm...>:

> Heiko,
>
> I think we should migrate to updated lfssytem eventually. However,  
> it will take
> some time to adapt all current scripts and packages. I'd rather  
> update glibc in
> 1.4 (in order to update dovecot) then freeze 1.4 (open for for  
> bugfixes/security
> updates only) and start building/using new lfssystem for 1.5.
>
> Probably we will be able to merge DL and DL_64 at this point at least for
> sources (for now  I use the toolchain with gcc-4.5.1, glibc-2.12,
> binutils-2.20.51.tar.bz2 (it's snapshot 2.20 actually) ).
>
>
> Serge
>
> On 11/16/2010 06:04 AM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>> No opinions on this?
>>
>> Heiko
>>
>> Quoting Heiko Zuerker<he...@zu...>:
>>
>>> Hey, I just added glibc 2.10.1 to a test compile, with dovecot 2.0.7 and
>>> a couple of other updates. I?m looking for opinions if we should
>>> ?backport? this to DL
>>> 1.4, or only make it available in the Dev version (1.5.x). --
>>> Regards    Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
> Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>



-- 

Regards
   Heiko Zuerker
   http://www.devil-linux.org


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Heiko,

I think we should migrate to updated lfssytem eventually. However, it will take 
some time to adapt all current scripts and packages. I'd rather update glibc in 
1.4 (in order to update dovecot) then freeze 1.4 (open for for bugfixes/security 
updates only) and start building/using new lfssystem for 1.5.

Probably we will be able to merge DL and DL_64 at this point at least for 
sources (for now  I use the toolchain with gcc-4.5.1, glibc-2.12, 
binutils-2.20.51.tar.bz2 (it's snapshot 2.20 actually) ).


Serge

On 11/16/2010 06:04 AM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> No opinions on this?
>
> Heiko
>
> Quoting Heiko Zuerker<he...@zu...>:
>
>> Hey, I just added glibc 2.10.1 to a test compile, with dovecot 2.0.7 and
>> a couple of other updates. I?m looking for opinions if we should
>> ?backport? this to DL
>> 1.4, or only make it available in the Dev version (1.5.x). --
>> Regards    Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org
>

On 11/14/10 19:24, Heiko Zuerker wrote:

> I just added glibc 2.10.1 to a test compile, with dovecot 2.0.7 and a
> couple of other updates.
> 
> I’m looking for opinions if we should ‘backport’ this to DL 1.4, or only
> make it available in the Dev version (1.5.x).

There was a request for dovecot 2.  I imagine there's quite a few dovecot
users, myself included, who would like to move to v2.  So I'd vote for putting
it into 1.4.

Dick

Unfortunately any version after glibc 2.10.1 requires a upgrade of  
gcc, which would be a pretty big impact.
I'll be working on that part for 1.5.

Heiko

Quoting Dominic Raferd <dl...@ed...>:

> sorry Heiko I have no opinion, it is over my head, but I see at
> http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/#CurrentStatus that the current stable
> version is 2.11.2.
>
> Dominic
>
> On 16/11/2010 14:04, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>> No opinions on this?
>>
>> Heiko
>>
>> Quoting Heiko Zuerker<he...@zu...>:
>>
>>> Hey, I just added glibc 2.10.1 to a test compile, with dovecot 2.0.7 and
>>> a couple of other updates. I?m looking for opinions if we should
>>> ?backport? this to DL
>>> 1.4, or only make it available in the Dev version (1.5.x). --
>>> Regards    Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
> Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>



-- 

Regards
   Heiko Zuerker
   http://www.devil-linux.org


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

I don't use dovecot, but in general I have no problem adding new
features to the current release, as long as it's nothing major, like a
2.8 kernel.

 - BS


On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:04, Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...> wrote:
> No opinions on this?
>
> Heiko
>
> Quoting Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...>:
>
>> Hey, I just added glibc 2.10.1 to a test compile, with dovecot 2.0.7 and
>> a couple of other updates. I?m looking for opinions if we should
>> ?backport? this to DL
>> 1.4, or only make it available in the Dev version (1.5.x). --
>> Regards    Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org

sorry Heiko I have no opinion, it is over my head, but I see at 
http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/#CurrentStatus that the current stable 
version is 2.11.2.

Dominic

On 16/11/2010 14:04, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> No opinions on this?
>
> Heiko
>
> Quoting Heiko Zuerker<he...@zu...>:
>
>> Hey, I just added glibc 2.10.1 to a test compile, with dovecot 2.0.7 and
>> a couple of other updates. I?m looking for opinions if we should
>> ?backport? this to DL
>> 1.4, or only make it available in the Dev version (1.5.x). --
>> Regards    Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org

No opinions on this?

Heiko

Quoting Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...>:

> Hey, I just added glibc 2.10.1 to a test compile, with dovecot 2.0.7 and
> a couple of other updates. I?m looking for opinions if we should  
> ?backport? this to DL
> 1.4, or only make it available in the Dev version (1.5.x). --   
> Regards    Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org

-- 

Regards
   Heiko Zuerker
http://www.devil-linux.org

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Hey,

 

I just added glibc 2.10.1 to a test compile, with dovecot 2.0.7 and a couple
of other updates.

I'm looking for opinions if we should 'backport' this to DL 1.4, or only
make it available in the Dev version (1.5.x).

 

-- 

 

Regards

   Heiko Zuerker

    <http://www.devil-linux.org> http://www.devil-linux.org

 

 

 

Hello DL Community!

it took forever, but 1.4 is finally released!
Get it from the usual places...

-- 

Regards
   Heiko Zuerker
   http://www.devil-linux.org


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Dominic,

Hopefully it has been fixed. Thank you for cooperation!

Serge

On 11/03/2010 11:24 AM, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> At last I got round to trying again with 1.4RC6 which seemed broken when
> I first tried it.
>
> I think I traced the problem I experienced back to a ROUTE line added at
> setup/upgrade time to ifcfg-eth0:
> ROUTE=" dev $DEVICE"
>
> This looks like a bug? Removing the line and doing /etc/init.d/network
> restart restored full functionality.
>
> Dominic
>
>
> On 07/09/2010 16:13, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>> I'd say check it in, this way we get more testers right away.
>> It'll probably be a few days before I get a chance to look at it.
>>
>> Heiko
>>
>> Quoting Serge Leschinsky<ser...@gm...>:
>>
>>> Done.
>>> The patches for setup (with "no additional space for DG") and for
>>> upgrade-config are enclosed.
>>>
>>> Serge
>>>
>>> On 09/06/2010 12:47 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>>>> It worked on my test machine, but it adds an additional space after the
>>>> default gateways IP (right before the closing " )
>>>>
>>>> Of course the next step is to correct the code in the "setup" program
>>>> (which by the way doesn't like the new ifcfg files).
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Achieve Improved Network Security with IP and DNS Reputation.
> Defend against bad network traffic, including botnets, malware,
> phishing sites, and compromised hosts - saving your company time,
> money, and embarrassment.   Learn More!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpdev2dev-nov
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>

At last I got round to trying again with 1.4RC6 which seemed broken when 
I first tried it.

I think I traced the problem I experienced back to a ROUTE line added at 
setup/upgrade time to ifcfg-eth0:
ROUTE=" dev $DEVICE"

This looks like a bug? Removing the line and doing /etc/init.d/network 
restart restored full functionality.

Dominic


On 07/09/2010 16:13, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> I'd say check it in, this way we get more testers right away.
> It'll probably be a few days before I get a chance to look at it.
>
> Heiko
>
> Quoting Serge Leschinsky<ser...@gm...>:
>
>> Done.
>> The patches for setup (with "no additional space for DG") and for
>> upgrade-config are enclosed.
>>
>> Serge
>>
>> On 09/06/2010 12:47 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>>> It worked on my test machine, but it adds an additional space after the
>>> default gateways IP (right before the closing " )
>>>
>>> Of course the next step is to correct the code in the "setup" program
>>> (which by the way doesn't like the new ifcfg files).
>>
>
>

Could you please put this in a bug report on Mantis? This way we won't  
forget it.
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mantisbt/devil-linux/my_view_page.php

Heiko

Quoting 吴鲁加 <wu...@gm...>:

> In devil-linux default boot.iso, snort can't  work as IPS, you need to
> configure Snort install with: “./configure —enable-inline” , follow
> this steps:
>
> 1. edit build/scripts/snort, add --enable-inline in ./configure.
> 2. edit build/scripts/iptables, add --enable-libipq -- snort need this
> lib to check packet in iptables's QUEUE.
> 3. download Libnet-1.0.2a, copy build/scripts/Libnet and edit it for  
> your need.
> 4. edit build/Makefile.build, change Libnet to Libnet-1.02a（snort
> can't work with Libnet > 1.1）;
> 5. edit build/Makefile.build, make sure snort build after
> iptables,because it need iptables's header and libs. snort: |
> $(GROUP_23) ;
> 6. and, because we use old libnet, syslog-ng will report an error,
> just edit build/script/syslog-ng, set --enable-spoof-source=no;
>
> that's it, you can make all to test it, if somebody want to use
> snort's IPS future, hope it helps.
>
> --
> wulujia<wu...@un...>
> Tel：400 1122 918
> Web：www.unnoo.com / www.xiaobai.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest
> Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in  U.S. and Canada
> $10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing
> Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>



-- 

Regards
   Heiko Zuerker
   http://www.devil-linux.org


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

In devil-linux default boot.iso, snort can't  work as IPS, you need to
configure Snort install with: “./configure —enable-inline” , follow
this steps:

1. edit build/scripts/snort, add --enable-inline in ./configure.
2. edit build/scripts/iptables, add --enable-libipq -- snort need this
lib to check packet in iptables's QUEUE.
3. download Libnet-1.0.2a, copy build/scripts/Libnet and edit it for your need.
4. edit build/Makefile.build, change Libnet to Libnet-1.02a（snort
can't work with Libnet > 1.1）;
5. edit build/Makefile.build, make sure snort build after
iptables,because it need iptables's header and libs. snort: |
$(GROUP_23) ;
6. and, because we use old libnet, syslog-ng will report an error,
just edit build/script/syslog-ng, set --enable-spoof-source=no;

that's it, you can make all to test it, if somebody want to use
snort's IPS future, hope it helps.

-- 
wulujia<wu...@un...>
Tel：400 1122 918
Web：www.unnoo.com / www.xiaobai.com

Quoting Benati Alberto <be...@ec...>:

> Someone can confirm (can be my build!) that scripts in /etc/cron.d not run?

I can confirm that it doesn't work.
Do you have time to look into the root cause? I won't get to it for a  
while....

-- 

Regards
   Heiko Zuerker
   http://www.devil-linux.org


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Someone can confirm (can be my build!) that scripts in /etc/cron.d not run?

Alberto

Hey,

 

We really need to get the final 1.4 out, so.

>From now on until 1.4 is released, only corrections and updates are
allowed, but no new features.

 

Regards

  Heiko Zuerker

  http://www.devil-linux.org

 

Hi everyone,

Devil-Linux 1.4RC6 is available for download.
Get it from the usual places.... :)

-- 

Regards
   Heiko Zuerker
   http://www.devil-linux.org


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

I'm working on adding the MailScanner files.
Currently all the binaries are installed directly into /usr/sbin . I'm  
wondering if it would make more sense having them in a separate dir,  
something like /usr/libexec/MailScanner to avoid possible conflicts.

Thoughts?

Heiko

Quoting Benati Alberto <be...@ec...>:

> Hi all,
> as usual a very long time!!
>
> I tested 1.4 and it's a nice work.
> Below there is a report and some changes that I have used, in attach
> there is the patchset.
> if some things are unclear please feel free to ask
>
> Update src:
>   clamav-0.96.2
>   httpd-2.2.16 (security)
>   libpng-1.2.44 (security)
>   MailScanner-4.81.3-1
>   mhash-0.9.9.9
>   netpbm-10.35.76
>   openldap-2.4.23 (security)
>   p7zip_9.13
>   php-5.2.14 (security)
>   shorewall-4.4.12
>   sudo-1.7.4p2
>   syslog-ng_3.0.8
>   tnef-1.4.7
>   unrarsrc-3.9.10
>
>
>
> Update src/perl-ext: (usefull for MailScanner also)
>   Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.030
>   Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.030
>   Compress-Zlib-2.015.tar.gz
>   DBD-mysql-4.017
>   DBD-Pg-2.17.1
>   DBD-SQLite-1.29
>   HTML-Parser-3.66
>   Mail-SPF-v2.007.tar.gz
>   MIME-Base64-3.09
>   MIME-tools-5.428
>
>
>
> Typo in: scripts/config/perl-ext
>   Crypt-OpenSSL (not exist)
>   IP-Country (2 items)
>   Pod-Readme (2 items)
>
> I have many warning in perl-ext for missing modules (but some  
> installed after),
> look for perl-ext/perl-ext and perl-ext/perl-ext.info with some adjusts
>
>
>
> Typo(?) in: Makefile.build
>   git is in GROUP_20 and GROUP_X
>
>
>
> Patchs:
>   *dovecot_sqlite (add sqlite support)
>   *httpd_ldap_dbd (add ldap and dbd (mysql/pgsql) auth and rewrite support)
>   *php_plus (add soap, wddx, ldap-sasl, exif, pcntl for phpsysinfo,
> etc.. and close to devil)
>   *clam_patchset-config_p7zip (drop Clam patchset (look below), and
> add p7zip config)
>   *update MySQL-python and python-ldap from 2.4 to new python versions
>   *Denyhosts (debian patch and close to)
>     +add denyhosts_2.6-7.diff.gz in src
>     -drop src/denyhosts_2.5-3.diff.gz and src/denyhosts.diff.gz
>   *perl_typo (typo?)
>
>   FOR COMPILE BUT NOT TESTED YET:
>   *sagator_Genshi (close to devil and look below for kid) and Genshi script
>     +necessary add Genshi-0.6.tar.gz in src
>   *Mailscanner_scripts (there is in src but not config)
>     +necessary add in perl-ext: Sys-SigAction-0.11.tar.gz
>
>
>
> Problems:
> - Clam Antivirus patchset (rar3 and 7-zip support)
>    missing patch for unrar, error in clamav install and in latest
> release there is internal support for unrar e 7zip
>
> - Kernel Magic Sysrq
>    freeze build process (in prepare), maybe a interactive input but I
> have not investigate
>
> - kid for sagator (if you use webq() for check false-positive), from  
> changelog:
>    from 1.2.x python-kid replaced by python-genshi (kid can be deleted
> from devil src!)
>    from 1.3.x python-jinja replace python-genshi (will be obsolete !??!)
>
>
>
> Delete packages (IMHO):
> - scponly
>    from 0.5 OpenSSH has chroot per user
>
>
>
> At last a question, is correct that:
> install: cfg_runlevel                             log:
> /build/tmp/LOGS/install/cfg_runlevel
> install: copy_libs                                log:
> /build/tmp/LOGS/install/copy_libs
> install: devildoc                                 log:
> /build/tmp/LOGS/install/devildoc
> install: man-pages                                log:
> /build/tmp/LOGS/install/man-pages
> install: cd_cleanup                               log:
> /build/tmp/LOGS/install/cd_cleanup
> install: finalize                                 log:
> /build/tmp/LOGS/install/finalize
> install: setfiledates                             log:
> /build/tmp/LOGS/install/setfiledates
>
> runs before Makefile.install.custom scripts?
> install: gettext                                  log:
> /build/tmp/LOGS/install/gettext
> install: GeoIP                                    log:
> /build/tmp/LOGS/install/GeoIP
> install: MailScanner                              log:
> /build/tmp/LOGS/install/MailScanner
> install: subversion                               log:
> /build/tmp/LOGS/install/subversion
> install: alby                                     log:
> /build/tmp/LOGS/install/alby
> install: git                                      log:
> /build/tmp/LOGS/install/git
>
> for example, I must add some users in passwd but passwd/group/shadow
> is already copy in $ETCDIR/etc
>
> Please keep up your great work
> Alby
>



-- 

Regards
   Heiko Zuerker
   http://www.devil-linux.org


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.