<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to 155: Improvment to UX in config method-javadoc</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/eclipse-cs/feature-requests/155/</link><description>Recent changes to 155: Improvment to UX in config method-javadoc</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/eclipse-cs/feature-requests/155/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 08:36:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/eclipse-cs/feature-requests/155/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Improvment to UX in config method-javadoc</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/eclipse-cs/feature-requests/155/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;It takes me a hour to notice that "scope:" in the Rule "Method Javadoc" is not the only scope javadocs are checked. No! Its the minimum-scope! It is not clear that other scopes will match too. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My thinking: I was wondering why methods are not marked with "Missing javadoc" when i reduce the "scope:" to "nothing".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Rader</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 08:36:47 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net6d4a582aa5f427ce226d9052728bc286b1c22616</guid></item></channel></rss>