<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent posts to Thousandths separators</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/gnuplot/discussion/5925/thread/f21e5e1981/</link><description>Recent posts to Thousandths separators</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/gnuplot/discussion/5925/thread/f21e5e1981/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:46:40 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/gnuplot/discussion/5925/thread/f21e5e1981/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Thousandths separators</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/gnuplot/discussion/5925/thread/f21e5e1981/?limit=25#41a8</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have been using gnuplot to look at the performance of some very high precision voltage measurements. At the level of precision I am talking about, I need to plot data and derive statistics info from numbers with up to eight digits after the decimal point.&lt;br/&gt;
In the same way as very large numbers become difficult to read without thousands separators, high precision numbers are much harder to read without being able to add thousandths separators. I have attached an example plot.&lt;br/&gt;
From what I can see, neither gprintf or sprintf support the use of thousandths separators.&lt;br/&gt;
Is there any way I can hook my own script or even C code into gnuplot's formatting functions to achieve this?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Johnson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:46:40 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net5ab7e9826a09e87ba0586b377673e514d7fc6eba</guid></item></channel></rss>