<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to 5: Switch away from Cindy to MINA</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/java-jml/feature-requests/5/</link><description>Recent changes to 5: Switch away from Cindy to MINA</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/java-jml/feature-requests/5/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:08:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/java-jml/feature-requests/5/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Switch away from Cindy to MINA</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/java-jml/feature-requests/5/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;MINA is a very nicely established framework that many projects use.  I'd like to switch to it not only because it seems to have active support and a -large- user base, but also because switching to it increases the likelihood that the person using this API won't have to include -yet another- library.  =)  (in other words, they might already be using MINA, it's not likely that they're already using cindy)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Henninger</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:08:04 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netb8bc22b911399f91de78b135a034cd6a34cb1dc6</guid></item></channel></rss>