<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to 45: IPA italics</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/45/</link><description>Recent changes to 45: IPA italics</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/45/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:17:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/45/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>IPA italics</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/45/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Such a beautiful, beautiful font! I use it for linguistics, and it is very IPA-capable. Except... please please add proper italic version of schwa (Unicode hex 0259 and 01DD) -- although text transcriptions mainly use regular, italics are standard both in examples with glossing lines and when quoting words in running text. Schwa is a particularly common symbol and slanting instead of proper italics does ruin the impression. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eva Lindström</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:17:28 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netf7049695d4186145508d8d58a235872e0b724c0c</guid></item></channel></rss>