<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to 59: Moving the ƕ hwair ligature from dlig into another feature</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/</link><description>Recent changes to 59: Moving the ƕ hwair ligature from dlig into another feature</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2019 20:26:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>#59 Moving the ƕ hwair ligature from dlig into another feature</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/?limit=25#f03c</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I mean I'll remove the OpenType lookup, not the hwair itself!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Baker</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2019 20:26:10 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.neteacc26bb7567621fb71ab317166f29fe6f737770</guid></item><item><title>#59 Moving the ƕ hwair ligature from dlig into another feature</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/?limit=100#b0ec</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I see. Very well, thank you very much!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kasper Sundström</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2019 20:19:05 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net7750617d3a202f37f6792c36133d9bff1e9c891c</guid></item><item><title>#59 Moving the ƕ hwair ligature from dlig into another feature</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/?limit=25#7e1c</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well, that is very weird. I have no idea why I put that ligature in dlig. There should be no ligature for hwair at all, in my (present) judgment. I'll remove it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Baker</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2019 20:16:20 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net2f512d01e09fa10fc91715e226e0191c8ad7bad3</guid></item><item><title>#59 Moving the ƕ hwair ligature from dlig into another feature</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/?limit=100#aeca</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Alternatively, if appropriate, the &lt;em&gt;general typographic&lt;/em&gt; ligatures (such as &lt;em&gt;ct&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;st&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;tr&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;tt&lt;/em&gt;) could perhaps be moved out of &lt;code&gt;dlig&lt;/code&gt; and into another ligature (or another feature) category?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kasper Sundström</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2019 19:50:00 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netd9ec5248615c7fbda6c90637fd81ac5f0df11596</guid></item><item><title>#59 Moving the ƕ hwair ligature from dlig into another feature</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/?limit=25#8a95</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Alternatively, if OpenType permits it, it could perhaps remain in &lt;code&gt;dlig&lt;/code&gt;, but be switched off via a stylistic set?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kasper Sundström</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2019 15:20:19 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net5a210d4551aa2ab047cb8a6251c87da901414b0b</guid></item><item><title>Moving the ƕ hwair ligature from dlig into another feature</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;First of all, since I am new here: thank you, sir, for this font! It has been my absolute favourite for use with XeLaTeX for many, many years now!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My issue is this: I have noticed that the &lt;strong&gt;Junicode OpenType rare/discretionary ligature feature (&lt;code&gt;dlig&lt;/code&gt;), while mostly containing general "language-independent" typographic ligatures&lt;/strong&gt;, such as &lt;em&gt;ct&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;st&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;tr&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;tt&lt;/em&gt; (in addition to the special cases Roman numerals and circled characters), &lt;strong&gt;also changes the letter combination &lt;em&gt;hv&lt;/em&gt; into the &lt;em&gt;ƕ&lt;/em&gt; hwair ligature&lt;/strong&gt;, which I learn is used specifically and exclusively for modern transliteration of Gothic. It seems reasonable to want to switch on the former rare but "general" ligatures, without switching on a ligature which ought not to be used outside the very specific context of Gothic transliteration (the letter combination &lt;em&gt;hv&lt;/em&gt; is quite prevalent e.g. my first language Swedish, in particular with older spelling). Hence, I would like to humbly request the &lt;em&gt;ƕ&lt;/em&gt; hwair ligature be moved from &lt;code&gt;dlig&lt;/code&gt; into another feature.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kasper Sundström</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2019 15:11:43 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net9e78b37cd0d7815f5fa837453a4f3a78997c81bb</guid></item></channel></rss>