<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to feature-requests</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/libgimli/feature-requests/</link><description>Recent changes to feature-requests</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/libgimli/feature-requests/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:46:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/libgimli/feature-requests/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>pytripatch for 2d PLC</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/libgimli/feature-requests/3/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;see title &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carsten</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:46:30 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netf18eb36a83bf4c6f1aafa81411802ae278dd86a5</guid></item><item><title>Improve pygimli API for constructors</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/libgimli/feature-requests/2/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;When calling a c++ class from an python console or editor, the documentation only shows the class description, not the description and syntax of the constructors. The latter is probably what users need most.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas Günther</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:47:06 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netd1cf512dcff748ae8b2d8b56eaf90231d75f9b75</guid></item><item><title>temporally variable lambda</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/libgimli/feature-requests/1/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please introduce a lambda which allows for user-specified values during inversion (e.g. imported via txt file). I'm issuing time-lapse inversion with different iteration numbers per timestep. Therefoe, it seems not useful to apply LAMBDADECREASE as it would cause models with different regularization parameters. I would be glad, if the lambda could be specified for each iteration. This would give the opportunity to choose a decrease in lambda for the first three iterations (for instance) and leave it constant for the following.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks and Cheers&lt;br /&gt;
Peter&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:50:14 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net7ea72197320c2d1ac35e48fe40cf53e7033f4a12</guid></item></channel></rss>