Easier said than done because snoop uses the raw input from the mud but script processing happens in many steps on different forms of input. A more likely possibility is to create a way for the raw mud logs to be read in with script being applied. That way script could be tested repeatedly on the same input.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Easier said than done because snoop uses the raw input from the mud but script processing happens in many steps on different forms of input. A more likely possibility is to create a way for the raw mud logs to be read in with script being applied. That way script could be tested repeatedly on the same input.