<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to feature-requests</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mspgcc4/feature-requests/</link><description>Recent changes to feature-requests</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mspgcc4/feature-requests/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:23:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mspgcc4/feature-requests/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Please add support for the new 430G2xx2 Devices</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mspgcc4/feature-requests/11/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ti is now releasing the 2nd Generation Value Line chips. Please add support for  these devices.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henry von Tresckow</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:23:51 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net9f1e3e3521dd0bc80fd0ee0eb19316ef39044801</guid></item><item><title>Support for msp430f550x chips</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mspgcc4/feature-requests/10/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;TI is now making available for samples the msp430f550x (especially msp430f5503) chips. Is the support of that chip on the roadmap?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:05:07 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netbec3f6c04cb2044c3b6c2bf94482c00e2d7f0c8c</guid></item><item><title>Adding mspgcc4 support for msp430G series</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mspgcc4/feature-requests/9/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;THe MSP430G series are new low cost msp controllers. As their pricing is okay, i want to develop with mspgcc4. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In general these are the following controllers: &lt;a href="http://www.ti.com/msp430value"&gt;http://www.ti.com/msp430value&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I especially need the MSPG2231 and MSP430G2131. I am not experience enough to add it myself. Please help me!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">overt2here</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:39:26 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net41f8c8e038fc85edc29a937524710fda3ccee197</guid></item><item><title>support msp55xx chips esp 5529</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mspgcc4/feature-requests/8/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;User request from mailing list.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter A. Bigot</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:17:28 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net213a30f55e9433709bbd789508e0f93dfe6f19cc</guid></item><item><title>Support MSP430X architecture</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mspgcc4/feature-requests/7/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Support for the MSP430 X-architecture is missing. As for example, the 54xx devices are equipped with mor than 64k of flash memory, it's desireable to use that space for code. &lt;br /&gt;
As for the MSP430X branch of the gcc3, it would be nice to have this __attribute__((far)) construct directing the compiler to generate correct CALLA, RETA, etc. instructions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Oliver Maye</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:56:01 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net8e2dbc6dbbd556dc75615203ac0ab09b14acde89</guid></item><item><title>Support for new chips</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mspgcc4/feature-requests/6/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Especially 41x2 devices. It would be nice to see this coming in a month or two.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 09:23:01 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net4efa081ead42d51f123ac83477b5f5e253d1aae9</guid></item><item><title>new Windows build, or build instructions</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mspgcc4/feature-requests/5/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I found another one of those incorrect base addresses in the hardware multiply routines for the CC430. It looks like you've got it fixed in the Subversion repository, but the last Windows binary release was a few months ago. So if you could produce a new Windows binary or at least instructions for building the binaries under MinGW, I'd appreciate it. Thanks again for providing an excellent compiler.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Armenia</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:53:36 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net9473d2d5d849f1fac52387b1ef3657987eabf883</guid></item><item><title>separate info sections</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mspgcc4/feature-requests/4/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Support is present for adding data to a generic "infomem" section, but more recent chips separate infomem into four areas, some of which have different properties.  There should be individual infoa infob infoc infod sections for those chips.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter A. Bigot</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 16:40:31 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netba5f045fbe4dd3aeabbd47411e2323a815c0dc3a</guid></item><item><title>STDLIB time.h</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mspgcc4/feature-requests/3/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Especially for porting projects to MSP430-based embedded systems it would be nice to rely on a more or less complete ISO C standard library. Currently, types and functions from "time.h" are missing.&lt;br /&gt;
So, the request is to provide headers and implementation for the full ISO C standard library. This can be an iterative process approaching the attribute "completeness" over time. First of all, types and functions defined in time.h are desired most.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Oliver Maye</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 07:05:35 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net0560b106d0a49c1f7064535f9530cf0d53caa837</guid></item><item><title>add __delay_cycles</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mspgcc4/feature-requests/2/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Need a facility for a cycle-count--based delay.  Should be an intrinsic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter A. Bigot</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:29:20 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net19359cbd43d7305bbe37daf21a807d08bdad4f8e</guid></item></channel></rss>