<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to feature-requests</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/nunitaddin/feature-requests/</link><description>Recent changes to feature-requests</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/nunitaddin/feature-requests/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:16:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/nunitaddin/feature-requests/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Download reflector through proxy</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/nunitaddin/feature-requests/9/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;After the installation of the last package &lt;br /&gt;
(ManagedAddIns-1.0.33.msi) I filled in the download form &lt;br /&gt;
for reflector but failed because I have to pass a firewall &lt;br /&gt;
with authentication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I've changed the files&lt;br /&gt;
RegisterForm.cs and&lt;br /&gt;
ReflectorInstaller.cs&lt;br /&gt;
and attached them to work around the problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It would be nice, if you could integrate the changes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Markus&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Barchfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:16:44 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net1ff66c3ea33f8305bdab50f2f12ca65de30e772e</guid></item><item><title>Re-Run last test</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/nunitaddin/feature-requests/8/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;It would be nice to have a command to re-run the last test.&lt;br /&gt;
Not necessarily a button or a context menu item, just a&lt;br /&gt;
command that could be bound to a keyboard shortcut&lt;br /&gt;
(that's where it would end up anyway).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Berindei</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:35:35 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netf36522d96f709a6850b25cbb8efc49f34d1ffe0b</guid></item><item><title>Show the Red/Yellow/Green Status</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/nunitaddin/feature-requests/7/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would like to see the colors. While it is *very* helpful &lt;br /&gt;
for the test information to appear in the build window, I &lt;br /&gt;
think it would also be helpful if an optional GUI &lt;br /&gt;
component (throught a checkbox on a property page, &lt;br /&gt;
perhaps) could be shown with the Red, Yellow, or Green &lt;br /&gt;
test status bars.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Kemp</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:12:28 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netb480f9cfce88841a77e2ad3afac8de2a22780136</guid></item><item><title>Debug Tests in Popup menu</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/nunitaddin/feature-requests/6/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Small feature request.  I'd like to see the Debug Tests &lt;br /&gt;
verb in the right-click popup menu instead of just under &lt;br /&gt;
tools.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Grim</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2003 04:41:55 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netb7c7fd5fca4bc1aae4a781492c74bcda0763c8f4</guid></item><item><title>Build with NUnit Addin does not save files</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/nunitaddin/feature-requests/5/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is an option in the VS .NET settings to save &lt;br /&gt;
source files when doing a build.  The NUnit Addin should &lt;br /&gt;
use those settings and save source files when it does a &lt;br /&gt;
build as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:03:45 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net6af2b402390578c0afdefb483ffd3a4f0c66c71b</guid></item><item><title>Register test assembly for non-test projects</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/nunitaddin/feature-requests/4/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would like to register a test assembly (either a project &lt;br /&gt;
in the solution or an external DLL) for projects that aren't &lt;br /&gt;
themselves test assemblies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ideal use case is where I'm working on my code, &lt;br /&gt;
then with a single keystroke build my code and run the &lt;br /&gt;
unit tests for it.  To do this, if the NUnitAddin already &lt;br /&gt;
knows the correct test assembly to run (because I've &lt;br /&gt;
registered it), I could replace the key binding for build &lt;br /&gt;
project with the addin's build &amp;amp;amp; test command.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alternatively, the addin could be set up to catch build &lt;br /&gt;
events and run the test after every successful project &lt;br /&gt;
build.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2002 19:30:38 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net035cbff2ddfcccf49fb4e7815a0798c209253520</guid></item><item><title>output results to file</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/nunitaddin/feature-requests/3/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;It would be nice to have an option to output the &lt;br /&gt;
results to a file which visual studio would &lt;br /&gt;
immediately open, rather than a standard output &lt;br /&gt;
window. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(I am thinking of something along the lines of the &lt;br /&gt;
way the tools-&amp;amp;gt;build comment web pages works)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With an approriate stylesheet, it would be possible &lt;br /&gt;
to have much nicer-looking and easier to read test &lt;br /&gt;
results, particularly when we are talking about large &lt;br /&gt;
numbers of tests.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A good example is the tests results generated for &lt;br /&gt;
the eclipse project. Here is one such page:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://download.eclipse.org/downloads/drops/N-" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://download.eclipse.org/downloads/drops/N-&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
N20021209-&lt;br /&gt;
200212090010/testresults/org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.r&lt;br /&gt;
efactoring_linux-motif.html&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(also attached)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 22:06:17 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net162fdfaa1af91b58a1513f5b8265a9daf613b88c</guid></item><item><title>Execute code snippit</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/nunitaddin/feature-requests/2/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I want to highlight a piece of code and choose to &lt;br /&gt;
execute the snippit in the test window.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use the code compile model.  See....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Building a .NET Shell-Level Infrastructure for C# Scripts&lt;br /&gt;
slides - 737 kb &lt;br /&gt;
code - 5 kb &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.sigs.de/download/dotnet_02/di09_esposito_sl" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sigs.de/download/dotnet_02/di09_esposito_sl&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
ides.zip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.sigs.de/download/dotnet_02/di09_esposito_s" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sigs.de/download/dotnet_02/di09_esposito_s&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
ource.zip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.sigs.de/download/dotnet_02/index.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sigs.de/download/dotnet_02/index.htm&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jamie Cansdale</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:24:49 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net1dfc7db043240a8e7b0c4accda272ac974aaf8af</guid></item><item><title>Build before running/debugging tests</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/nunitaddin/feature-requests/1/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is it possible to do a &amp;amp;quot;Build Solution&amp;amp;quot; automatically &lt;br /&gt;
before tests are run?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can understand that this would be anoying overhead if &lt;br /&gt;
you run a number of individual tests, but I also find it &lt;br /&gt;
anoying to have to build manually in my code/test cycle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I feel a program is verified for correctness in a number of &lt;br /&gt;
steps.&lt;br /&gt;
1. build it, this catches compiler errors&lt;br /&gt;
2. unit test it, this catches errors in the implementation &lt;br /&gt;
of the spec&lt;br /&gt;
3. user test it, this catches errors in the specification of &lt;br /&gt;
the requirements&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I feel that any level has to be preceded by lower levels. &lt;br /&gt;
Don't user test unless you unit tested. Don't unit test &lt;br /&gt;
unless you compiled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that I ask for a &amp;amp;quot;Build&amp;amp;quot;, not a &amp;amp;quot;Rebuild&amp;amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
Theoretically, a build of only those assemblies that &lt;br /&gt;
contain tests is sufficient. Maybe this can be detected &lt;br /&gt;
easily when a reference to ununit.framework is found in &lt;br /&gt;
the project.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Comments?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kris Vandermotten</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:38:54 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net3e882a3786f4a1ca807c406621b4287ae22fa2e4</guid></item></channel></rss>