<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to feature-requests</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/proxytunnel/feature-requests/</link><description>Recent changes to feature-requests</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/proxytunnel/feature-requests/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 09:20:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/proxytunnel/feature-requests/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>SSL certificate check </title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/proxytunnel/feature-requests/7/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please add checking of SSL certificate which is used to communicate with remote HTTPS proxy. This is important because local proxy can replace original certificate with fake one and sniff the traffic. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maxim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 09:20:58 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netd7917c4309b086b8ae8775936f1e94d1bb4b59b4</guid></item><item><title>NTLMv1 support</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/proxytunnel/feature-requests/6/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;br /&gt;
great piece of software! It is amazing, but I need NTLMv1 support. Is there any plan to add it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leandro Dardini</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:38:11 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net9bc92e2c760b492ae64cef821ec9ac61905f29bf</guid></item><item><title>host and port from config file or ENV?</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/proxytunnel/feature-requests/5/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I like that the user and pass can be pulled from ENV now, but would &lt;br /&gt;
it be possible to have the destination hostname and port to come &lt;br /&gt;
from somewhere other than proxy tunnel's command line?  As it is &lt;br /&gt;
now, if someone does a PS, they will see:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;proxytunnel -G proxy -g port -D homecomputer.adsl.com -d 22&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and it might look bad.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just a thought.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoffy97</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 11:17:49 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netf3f7281123022023709129fb559f59b0150f408f</guid></item><item><title>NTLM auth</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/proxytunnel/feature-requests/4/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;my corporate's proxy uses NTLM auth and don't allow &lt;br /&gt;
access even if i use proxytunnel.&lt;br /&gt;
Could you add this feature to the next release of your &lt;br /&gt;
wonderful hack ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicolas Karageuzian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 20:19:11 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net453384f3eb4e3f3c330395c1a9cd40124c3d0092</guid></item><item><title>Local Port Forwarding instead of stdin</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/proxytunnel/feature-requests/3/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;It would make the tunnel easier to bind to local TCP port &lt;br /&gt;
and to listen, instead of reading stdin, because with &lt;br /&gt;
windows there are very few programs which generate &lt;br /&gt;
standard output, and many which have configurable &lt;br /&gt;
destination IP/port. For Example: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-l 127.0.0.1 -p 5022  would listen at local IP 127.0.0.1 &lt;br /&gt;
tcp port 5022 for connections which should be tunneled &lt;br /&gt;
out&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cracket</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2003 15:51:38 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netfbaffb3da21c8fbbb6fd435247877fb89e179eb0</guid></item><item><title>remote user name option</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/proxytunnel/feature-requests/2/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The local user name and remote user name aren't&lt;br /&gt;
necessarily the same. An option to specify the remote&lt;br /&gt;
user name would be very useful.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2003 21:10:05 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net23c4d7b36f54155379a6fb699d2b78a0e2d0de32</guid></item><item><title>proxy authentication support</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/proxytunnel/feature-requests/1/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;message returned by proxytunnel when trying to use a &lt;br /&gt;
proxy which requires authentication.&lt;br /&gt;
HTTP return code: '407'&lt;br /&gt;
Proxy Authentication Required&lt;br /&gt;
Is this feature planned in the future ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:00:39 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net669384316a28e9b65afde3ddbe10088dd95c96ab</guid></item></channel></rss>