<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to bugs</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/punlinux/bugs/</link><description>Recent changes to bugs</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/punlinux/bugs/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:13:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/punlinux/bugs/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Outstanding Issues</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/punlinux/bugs/2/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here are some outstanding issues with the translation&lt;br /&gt;
files:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* Invalid use of vowel signs with Ura, Era and Iri.  It&lt;br /&gt;
should be noted that in all cases, the pre-composed&lt;br /&gt;
glyphs should be used and you should not construct them&lt;br /&gt;
yourself.  For example:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Punjabi vowel letter I SHOULD be constructed using a&lt;br /&gt;
single codepoint - U+0A07.  It should NOT be&lt;br /&gt;
constructed using  U+0A72 + U+0A3F.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This peculiarity ONLY applies when using Ura, Era and&lt;br /&gt;
Iri.  It does NOT apply to other letters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* Invalid use of proposed extensions to Unicode&lt;br /&gt;
submitted by TDIL that were not accepted.  For further&lt;br /&gt;
details, see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://tdil.mit.gov.in/prop_uni/Gurmukhi.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tdil.mit.gov.in/prop_uni/Gurmukhi.pdf&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The characters that should not be used (i.e. ones NOT&lt;br /&gt;
accepted by the Unicode consortium) are:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U+0A7E  -&amp;gt;  Use U+0A06 + U+0A02 instead&lt;br /&gt;
U+0A50  -&amp;gt;  Use U+0A74 instead&lt;br /&gt;
U+0A74  -&amp;gt;  Use U+262C instead&lt;br /&gt;
U+0A3B  -&amp;gt;  Use U+0A71 instead&lt;br /&gt;
U+0A4E  -&amp;gt;  Use U+0A4D + U+0A39 instead (CONJUNCT)&lt;br /&gt;
U+0A4F  -&amp;gt;  Use U+0A4D + U+0A30 instead (CONJUNCT)&lt;br /&gt;
U+0A64  -&amp;gt;  Use U+0964 instead&lt;br /&gt;
U+0A65  -&amp;gt;  Use U+0965 instead&lt;br /&gt;
U+0A76  -&amp;gt;  Use U+0A4D + U+0A35 instead (CONJUNCT)&lt;br /&gt;
U+0A78  -&amp;gt;  Use U+0A4D + U+0A2F instead (CONJUNCT)&lt;br /&gt;
U+0A7D  -&amp;gt;  Use U+0A40 + U+0A02 instead&lt;br /&gt;
U+0A7E  -&amp;gt;  Use U+0A3E + U+0A02 instead&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following characters do not have an equivalent in&lt;br /&gt;
the Unicode standard at present.  However, they are not&lt;br /&gt;
used in modern Punjabi, so they should not pose a&lt;br /&gt;
problem at this stage.  They are:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U+0A3A&lt;br /&gt;
U+0A77&lt;br /&gt;
U+0A79&lt;br /&gt;
U+0A7A&lt;br /&gt;
U+0A7B&lt;br /&gt;
U+0A7C&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*Conjuncts NOT used.  Unfortunately, U+0A4E, U+0A4F,&lt;br /&gt;
U+0A76 and U+0A78 seem to be used instead of conjuncts.&lt;br /&gt;
Conjuncts are the CORRECT way of encoding these signs&lt;br /&gt;
in  Unicode - See above for details of using conjuncts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A full list of conjuncts in Unicode 4 are available at&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://guca.sf.net/fonts/"&gt;http://guca.sf.net/fonts/&lt;/a&gt; at the bottom of the page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-------------------------------------------------------&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Saab is currently the ONLY compatible Unicode 4 font&lt;br /&gt;
available freely on the internet.  It should be used&lt;br /&gt;
instead of other incompatible fonts.  Saab contains all&lt;br /&gt;
conjuncts and position features neccessary for Unicode&lt;br /&gt;
Gurmukhi.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://guca.sf.net/fonts/"&gt;http://guca.sf.net/fonts/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sukh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:13:57 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netb56b3fe2961045c954b8cc8aed2709e5cf9b9b5b</guid></item><item><title>GurSerif Bug in Gnome &amp; Fedora</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/punlinux/bugs/1/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is bug in Gnome 2.6 files and also in the Fedora&lt;br /&gt;
Project.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All the Words are represented by the more Glyphs and in&lt;br /&gt;
GurSerif there is no Glyphs. Now Need to reedit the files.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;with GurSerif fonts ,there is no such Problem, but&lt;br /&gt;
actual this is not correct form. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amanpreet Singh Alam</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 14:31:53 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net176ab4553b5bf61e7726584553fa3b379b4b94c7</guid></item></channel></rss>