<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to 61: VSS Integration requires synch force</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/querycommander/feature-requests/61/</link><description>Recent changes to 61: VSS Integration requires synch force</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/querycommander/feature-requests/61/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:09:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/querycommander/feature-requests/61/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>VSS Integration requires synch force</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/querycommander/feature-requests/61/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The VSS Integration is almost useless as a user can &lt;br /&gt;
change objects in the database and separately in VSS &lt;br /&gt;
and he is not forced to make the change in &lt;br /&gt;
VSS/SQLServer to SQLServer/VSS. When using &lt;br /&gt;
QueryCommander, a change in the database or VSS should &lt;br /&gt;
always be marked to be synchronized. Otherwise &lt;br /&gt;
inconsistency between VSS and SQLServer is preassigned.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m.hilpert</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:09:22 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net444c62e9d7872afc846ab2d5eefa4b6f2a01a004</guid></item></channel></rss>