<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to 1: method names starting with uppercase</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/ruby-xlib-wrap/bugs/1/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/ruby-xlib-wrap/bugs/1/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/ruby-xlib-wrap/bugs/1/</id><updated>2003-05-05T15:50:08Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to 1: method names starting with uppercase</subtitle><entry><title>method names starting with uppercase</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/ruby-xlib-wrap/bugs/1/" rel="alternate"/><published>2003-05-05T15:50:08Z</published><updated>2003-05-05T15:50:08Z</updated><author><name>Michal Suchanek</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/hramrach/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net81c3e21c4280d57b4a34720eb98accdd54fb7fea</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;IIRC I read in some ruby manual that it is recommended&lt;br /&gt;
to start method names with a lowercase letter (which is&lt;br /&gt;
also what my syntax highlighting config assumes),&lt;br /&gt;
because names starting with uppercase could cause some&lt;br /&gt;
problems.&lt;br /&gt;
I had myself no problems with method names starting&lt;br /&gt;
with uppercase letters. On the other hand, it could be&lt;br /&gt;
a good idea for a library to follow  the conventions&lt;br /&gt;
even if the uppercase letters were no problem at all.&lt;br /&gt;
Since all the methods I have seen start with uppercase&lt;br /&gt;
X it should cause no interface problems to change to&lt;br /&gt;
lowercase x, imho.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>