<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to 1: method names starting with uppercase</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ruby-xlib-wrap/bugs/1/</link><description>Recent changes to 1: method names starting with uppercase</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/ruby-xlib-wrap/bugs/1/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2003 15:50:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/ruby-xlib-wrap/bugs/1/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>method names starting with uppercase</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ruby-xlib-wrap/bugs/1/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;IIRC I read in some ruby manual that it is recommended&lt;br /&gt;
to start method names with a lowercase letter (which is&lt;br /&gt;
also what my syntax highlighting config assumes),&lt;br /&gt;
because names starting with uppercase could cause some&lt;br /&gt;
problems.&lt;br /&gt;
I had myself no problems with method names starting&lt;br /&gt;
with uppercase letters. On the other hand, it could be&lt;br /&gt;
a good idea for a library to follow  the conventions&lt;br /&gt;
even if the uppercase letters were no problem at all.&lt;br /&gt;
Since all the methods I have seen start with uppercase&lt;br /&gt;
X it should cause no interface problems to change to&lt;br /&gt;
lowercase x, imho.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michal Suchanek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2003 15:50:08 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net81c3e21c4280d57b4a34720eb98accdd54fb7fea</guid></item></channel></rss>