Recent changes to bugs

#2 First steps

Richard_on_SF — Tue, 19 May 2015 14:03:35 -0000

Would it be possible to run your code as stand-alone without validating with some sort of server such as app running on mobiles?

First steps

Richard_on_SF — Tue, 19 May 2015 13:59:55 -0000

Dear brudner,

After viewing your project, I decided to give it a try. I'm using Visual Studio Ultimate 2013 as IDE. In the past I develop a few project using VB6. Here's my question. In the Main Sub you looking for connectivity with the server. Could you please tell me what server you're taking about?

    Shared Sub Main()

       'code before here

        'Try to get a Pipeline to see if the server is online

        Try
            With Factory.CreatePipeline()
                .Dispose()
            End With
        Catch sockEx As Net.Sockets.SocketException
            MsgBox("Unable to communicate with server!" & Environment.NewLine & "Ensure the the Service or the ConsoleService is running and the Ports are configured." & Environment.NewLine & Environment.NewLine & sockEx.ToString, MsgBoxStyle.Critical Or MsgBoxStyle.OKOnly, "No communication.")
            Exit Sub
        End Try
    'code after here
    End Sub

NextCode status not returned immediately

applecran — Fri, 03 Mar 2006 01:20:40 -0000

Hi,
Fist, I want to say you've done a great job with this
and we really appreciate it.

I'm not sure this is a bug or is working as expected
but here is what happens.

If the current entry causes an accessDenied status,
sometimes this also triggers a "NextCode" status to
be set on the user's account in the rsa server. You
can see this by login onto the RSA Auth manager and
looking at the account details right after each
access denied.

The problem is that the access denied is passed back
as the resultcode and not the nextcode. To get the
nextcode to be sent back, we must first use the next
valid code, at that point, we get the NextCode
status, we then have to wait for the nextvalid code,
at which point we get a success.

It would be great if we could either treat an
accessdenied in the same manor as a nextcode (i.e.
cache it, and then try a to send next code
imediately) or to have the next code returned when it
is set.

Hopefully this makes sense, if not please let me know
what other info you need.