https://sourceforge.net/p/simpleproxy/bugs/2016-05-05T06:46:39.779000ZRecent changes to bugs2016-05-05T06:46:39.779000Z2016-05-05T06:46:39.779000Zlordhttps://sourceforge.net/u/lord/https://sourceforge.netb7a12d211beb09ca29a474884422beec3acd43d4

<div class="markdown_content"><p>Project moved to <a href="https://github.com/vzaliva/simpleproxy" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/vzaliva/simpleproxy</a><br/> Please submit new issues and patches there. This page is no longer updated.</p></div>

2016-05-05T06:28:59.649000Z2016-05-05T06:28:59.649000Zlordhttps://sourceforge.net/u/lord/https://sourceforge.net6b1df1bc3734fe415627bb50c18d483652eafa37

<div class="markdown_content"><ul> <li><strong>status</strong>: open --&gt; closed-fixed</li> <li><strong>Group</strong>: --&gt; </li> </ul></div>

2016-05-05T06:25:25.852000Z2016-05-05T06:25:25.852000ZAndrew Pollockhttps://sourceforge.net/u/apollock/https://sourceforge.netf6719063668cabd28c04b900fbe636e9cf6fef0f

<div class="markdown_content"><p>Are you compiling with gcc -Wall<br/> ?</p></div>

2016-05-05T06:24:21.354000Z2016-05-05T06:24:21.354000Zlordhttps://sourceforge.net/u/lord/https://sourceforge.netd402f7a51b935d3f1b940a2278d958e622cf8af4

<div class="markdown_content"><p>I am not familiar with getnameinfo and I am not sure how to test if switching to it also address the problem in this ticket. I will appreciate if somebody would try it and send me a patch :)</p></div>

2016-05-05T06:02:04.467000Z2016-05-05T06:02:04.467000Zlordhttps://sourceforge.net/u/lord/https://sourceforge.net4c780201df26c15bfd98b491b218bac86dcba7bb

<div class="markdown_content"><p>I applied part of this patch which relates to removing unused variables in cfg.c. It was not causing any problem, but it is cleaner to remove them.</p> <p>The remaining bulk of this patch just renames 'log' functions with to 'sp_log' everywhere. I do not see why it is necessary. The code compiles without problem with old names. I just checked under Linux and MacOS.</p></div>

2016-05-05T05:58:13.612000Z2016-05-05T05:58:13.612000ZAndrew Pollockhttps://sourceforge.net/u/apollock/https://sourceforge.net66b7c427811461e2ff1d2f8f5463013129c35ccd

<div class="markdown_content"><p>IMO it's worthwhile being consistent, so use getnameinfo everywhere</p></div>

2016-05-05T05:55:35.289000Z2016-05-05T05:55:35.289000Zlordhttps://sourceforge.net/u/lord/https://sourceforge.net7b4ea4d4b636a027d98f720355cfc577e8e8e17c

<div class="markdown_content"><p>I have partially applied this patch. <br/> The first occurence of 'gethosbyaddr' was eliminated by earier patch:<br/> <a href="https://sourceforge.net/p/simpleproxy/patches/4/">https://sourceforge.net/p/simpleproxy/patches/4/</a><br/> I am wondering if the remaining gethostbuaddr application also poses a performance issue as reported in #4?</p></div>

2016-05-05T05:55:08.887000Z2016-05-05T05:55:08.887000Zlordhttps://sourceforge.net/u/lord/https://sourceforge.net1aaebf1e8537cc12ab7c66330412dd559732c6c9

<div class="markdown_content"><p>I have partially applied this patch. <br/> The first occurence of 'gethosbyaddr' was eliminated by earier patch:</p> <p><a href="https://sourceforge.net/p/simpleproxy/patches/4/">https://sourceforge.net/p/simpleproxy/patches/4/</a></p> <p>I am wondering if the remaining gethostbuaddr application also poses a performance issue as reported in #4?</p></div>

2016-05-05T05:47:16.469000Z2016-05-05T05:47:16.469000Zlordhttps://sourceforge.net/u/lord/https://sourceforge.net6b03fcd1d062e0e22026591d49953cd38f69ac9d

<div class="markdown_content"><ul> <li><strong>status</strong>: open --&gt; closed-fixed</li> <li><strong>Group</strong>: --&gt; </li> </ul></div>

2016-05-05T05:43:57.893000Z2016-05-05T05:43:57.893000Zlordhttps://sourceforge.net/u/lord/https://sourceforge.net383ea486bf7363b62d8ead739135f84ef17d09e6

<div class="markdown_content"><ul> <li><strong>status</strong>: open --&gt; closed-fixed</li> <li><strong>Group</strong>: --&gt; </li> </ul></div>