<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to 110: Make it possible to not restart JVM in response to kill -9</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/wrapper/feature-requests/110/</link><description>Recent changes to 110: Make it possible to not restart JVM in response to kill -9</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/wrapper/feature-requests/110/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:34:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/wrapper/feature-requests/110/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Make it possible to not restart JVM in response to kill -9</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/wrapper/feature-requests/110/</link><description>When I kill -9 a JVM process, I want it to go away. 
If I kill -9 a wrapped JVM process, the wrapper interprets its disappearance as an unexpected exit and automatically launches a new JVM. I think it'd be nice if there was a configuration parameter that allowed me to tell the wrapper to effectively ignore the SIGKILL signal. With the flag set, instead of launching a new JVM, the native wrapper process would immediately exit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Khan Tasinga</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:34:14 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net42eecca19ed8c320cc027d6be86f2ff6286b2b74</guid></item></channel></rss>