Please consider giving all binaries better names in Version 4.0.0. The sole name wrapper isn't really helpful and way generic. Consider making it jsw, jsw.jar, libjsw.so, etc.
Thanks for the feedback. This is already something we have discussed internally a couple times. But it would cause more confusion for long time users.
As is the Wrapper already allows you to change the wrapper binary name to anything you wish. Likewise the jar file can also be modified. I usually name it wrapper-3.5.43.jar in our applications.
This sounds like an option at first glance, but at the end it isn't one. I don't have a specific application I use with JSW. I do maintain the FreeBSD Port of and expect for the ports using it the rest remains anonymous to me. I don't want to start to explain why I have renamed the artifacts, that they have to change config files and properties. I just expect a sane default name.
I would go with your option if I would have a private, isolated application.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Thanks for the feedback. This is already something we have discussed internally a couple times. But it would cause more confusion for long time users.
As is the Wrapper already allows you to change the wrapper binary name to anything you wish. Likewise the jar file can also be modified. I usually name it wrapper-3.5.43.jar in our applications.
The wrapper.native_library property also allows you to modify change the base bane of the native library.
https://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-native-library.html
Please let me know how these work for you.
Cheers,
Leif
Leave me a couple of days to digest this...
This sounds like an option at first glance, but at the end it isn't one. I don't have a specific application I use with JSW. I do maintain the FreeBSD Port of and expect for the ports using it the rest remains anonymous to me. I don't want to start to explain why I have renamed the artifacts, that they have to change config files and properties. I just expect a sane default name.
I would go with your option if I would have a private, isolated application.