<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to feature-requests</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/wttools/feature-requests/</link><description>Recent changes to feature-requests</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/wttools/feature-requests/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2002 11:13:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/wttools/feature-requests/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>better names for test of methods with ar</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/wttools/feature-requests/11/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is not possible to relate the name of a generated &lt;br /&gt;
methods for a methods with arguments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eks:&lt;br /&gt;
The original methods is named:&lt;br /&gt;
ComponentAdapter getComponent( String className ) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The generated testmethod is name:&lt;br /&gt;
public void testGetComponent1195259493() &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What about generating something like&lt;br /&gt;
public void testGetComponent_Args_className()&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kaspar Lund</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2002 11:13:56 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netcd4d431be3a7caffebd873a641789c2b2addebe7</guid></item><item><title>Support exclude tag in taskant.UnitTests</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/wttools/feature-requests/10/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Provide a way to tell UnitTestGen to skip certain &lt;br /&gt;
methods, classes, or packages during test generation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ed MacDonald</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2002 03:52:25 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net991bca4a8b1143bde21b9cda3b13fd40362effd2</guid></item><item><title>Generate one testMethod for set/get pair</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/wttools/feature-requests/9/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Detect set/get pairs as found in beans and generate a &lt;br /&gt;
single test method.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently two test methods will be generated that do &lt;br /&gt;
the same thing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ed&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ed MacDonald</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2002 02:58:26 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net8f51cc7465b3c08eec07de89986c023ea9a85f98</guid></item><item><title>Define new methods content</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/wttools/feature-requests/8/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is recommended to add feature which allow&lt;br /&gt;
define content of new created methods in&lt;br /&gt;
test classes. The possiblities are:&lt;br /&gt;
1. Empty content - the worst, but may be usefull in&lt;br /&gt;
some cases.&lt;br /&gt;
2. Content in created methods is fullfiled by comments&lt;br /&gt;
with usefull info.&lt;br /&gt;
3. Instead of comments or additionally to comments &lt;br /&gt;
there is possiblity to create unit test engine warning&lt;br /&gt;
which tells that this is empty test method and &lt;br /&gt;
real test code should be added&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Artur Hefczyc</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2002 09:00:01 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.nete365f524fbe1951dbcadb78f2822e7cad624614c</guid></item><item><title>More default values of classes for tests</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/wttools/feature-requests/7/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;It seems that it could be useful to create more&lt;br /&gt;
default test values for test code for different&lt;br /&gt;
classes.&lt;br /&gt;
For example there are many commonly used classes&lt;br /&gt;
in packages:&lt;br /&gt;
java.io.*&lt;br /&gt;
java.net.*&lt;br /&gt;
java.util.*&lt;br /&gt;
and so on...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Artur Hefczyc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2001 17:38:44 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net76a0a3e44d2342e2e7c3df0e1cf66116a71bed4e</guid></item><item><title>Hints for methods throwing exceptions</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/wttools/feature-requests/6/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;More hints for methods throwing exceptions are &lt;br /&gt;
necessary. Especially methods which throw &lt;br /&gt;
java.lang.Exception should be highlighted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Artur Hefczyc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2001 17:36:43 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netb922ab9cfbe45a5622a053beb97fe915f0fa3e6f</guid></item><item><title>JUnit messages instead of just comments</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/wttools/feature-requests/5/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;It could be very useful if code generator could&lt;br /&gt;
create some piece of code generating JUnit messages &lt;br /&gt;
instead of just comments in Test classes for found &lt;br /&gt;
code hints.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If code analyser find strange or danger constructions&lt;br /&gt;
or simple find some useful info about classes, methods&lt;br /&gt;
and so on it can put comments inline in Test classes&lt;br /&gt;
code or maybe it should put some code which would&lt;br /&gt;
generate JUnit warning messages.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These messages could be found in JUnit reports.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Artur Hefczyc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2001 17:34:42 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netb20f467f38fa5374e4810819e06c2a1c8d0ec753</guid></item><item><title>Hints for public methods</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/wttools/feature-requests/4/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;There should be more hints for public methods&lt;br /&gt;
which could explain what for strange parameter&lt;br /&gt;
values should be prepared.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Artur Hefczyc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2001 17:27:28 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net01287662cc0f3f34e416de29cf12d658a2518d6a</guid></item><item><title>A way for creating default test values</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/wttools/feature-requests/3/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is recommended to create interface for&lt;br /&gt;
easy extending default test values for&lt;br /&gt;
different classes used in other projects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This interface must be very easy to use&lt;br /&gt;
such as text file which contains:&lt;br /&gt;
class_name: list of default test values.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And maybe it could be posible to create simple&lt;br /&gt;
GUI for managing such files.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Artur Hefczyc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2001 17:20:14 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.neta98a33f010460d28b0c8d0a9f6e324b6d9366e0b</guid></item><item><title>Config file for tests code generators</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/wttools/feature-requests/2/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is recommended to create posibility of&lt;br /&gt;
use config file for setting job parameters&lt;br /&gt;
instead of long list of command line parameters.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Artur Hefczyc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2001 17:14:59 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net640611792e8b62357dd5553a93a96319421ae06d</guid></item></channel></rss>