<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to bugs</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/xmlpipedb/bugs/</link><description>Recent changes to bugs</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/xmlpipedb/bugs/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 04:15:40 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/xmlpipedb/bugs/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>E. coli will not build with gmb 2.0 alpha 6</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/xmlpipedb/bugs/50/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I started the E. coli build last night around 5:30 and this morning it still hadn't finished; I'm attaching a screen shot of the console screen for potential error messages you can decode.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeffrey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 04:15:40 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net2f5dfb97ec8805a4122e5d3a6d43ec09aa954fd0</guid></item><item><title>Gene Ontology export not working</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/xmlpipedb/bugs/49/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gene Ontology tables were messed up in gmb 2.0 alpha 6.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The GeneOntology table was empty, the GeneOntologyCount and Tree tables only had three records in them, the top three nodes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The alpha5 version of GM builder had created full tables, so I don't know what happened here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeffrey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 04:13:17 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net79a48805c3c764295357887d42a34c8893dc5f94</guid></item><item><title>Tallies menu confusing</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/xmlpipedb/bugs/48/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The menu items are a little confusing--there is no way to tally the GO entries in the postgres database without doing the "full monty" is that right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeffrey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:55:48 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net34d68139993dcfb321ced2892a4714cca555fd18</guid></item><item><title>Tallies not correct for Obo dbxref</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/xmlpipedb/bugs/47/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I tried out the tally engine for UniProt XML on my large file and it gave me the right number of entries for UniProt, but it was off by 20 for obo/term/def/dbxref, see attached screen shot. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeffrey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:53:25 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netc55401cd5da0aeeb34c271f05082e7aae7a7d1bb</guid></item><item><title>Tallies not correct</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/xmlpipedb/bugs/45/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some, but not all, of the database numbers appear to be exactly double the XML numbers; might you have some prior import sitting in the database?  If this was not the case, then we'll have to look at the database queries that you used; perhaps there's a join sitting in there that is incorrectly inflating the number of rows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John David N. Dionisio, PhD&lt;br /&gt;
Assistant Professor, Computer Science&lt;br /&gt;
Loyola Marymount University &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeffrey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:24:22 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net5887f03b80f6ab2c01307ceac5d7dbc90a36d637</guid></item><item><title>Arabidopsis not exported correctly</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/xmlpipedb/bugs/44/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have attached a word document that contains just one entry from the Arabidopsis XML to illustrate what I am talking about.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;--Some earlier version of GenMAPP Builder was able to detect when a gene ID system used by GenMAPP exists in the XML.  The current GM builder can do this to some extent because this is how it is detecting the presence of UniGene as a system (UniGene didn't exist for E. coli).  The UniGene part of the XML is highlighted in magenta in the word document.  In the Systems table of the access gene database, UniGene has the system code of "U".   Right now, GMbuilder is building a UniGene table and the appropriate relationship tables.  It is adding a date to the date record of the Systems table for UniGene.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;--Similarly, GMBuilder should detect the presence of TAIR as a gene ID system already known about by GenMAPP.  TAIR is already listed in the Systems table of the access template file with the SystemCode of "A".  The place where you should be getting the TAIR IDs from in the XML is highlighted in green.  You should make the TAIR table from there, put a date in the date field of the TAIR record in the Systems table, and change the Columns field to "ID|".&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;--DO NOTHING with OrderedLocusNames.  I have highlighted that part of the XML as yellow.  I do not want us to take the IDs from there at all.  I don't want the TAIR table derived from these data at all.  The OrderedLocusNames field in the Systems table should be left alone, no date put in it.  Note this is not a matter of only using OrderedLocus or only using ORF from the XML; I am saying don't take data from this part of the XML at all and do nothing with the OrderedLocusNames field in the Systems table.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is something specifically to do with Arabidopsis.  I have examined the IDs coming from the OrderedLocusNames portion of the XML and have found some problems.  Since the data are available in another part of the XML record, I would rather take TAIR IDs from there than from the OrderdLocusNames portion of the XML.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, in the Relations table, there are System codes being used there that are incorrect.  The Systems table is the place to look for the official System codes.  I don't know how the incorrect codes cropped in because this wasn't an issue with the E. coli database.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;
Kam &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeffrey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:20:20 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net1d7d14ce6c834463f05e68bb25b679dbbc2f51e6</guid></item><item><title>Dist script needs to be more robust</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/xmlpipedb/bugs/43/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The gmbuilder.bat script that is currently included with GenMAPP Builder &lt;br /&gt;
assumes that java is on the user's path.  Kam and I discovered that the &lt;br /&gt;
latest Java installer does not actually do this for you; what can we do to &lt;br /&gt;
handle this situation?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we can't build this into the batch file, I can think of a few alternatives:&lt;br /&gt;
- Provide a README in the dist that tells the user how to add Java to their &lt;br /&gt;
path.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Rearrange the dist so that gmbuilder.jar is at the top of the directory, &lt;br /&gt;
with supporting libraries in lib/.  The user then double-clicks on &lt;br /&gt;
gmbuilder.jar to run.  gmbuilder.bat can be used for a more advanced &lt;br /&gt;
user who would like to tweak the heap memory settings or modify the log &lt;br /&gt;
level.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- As a variation on the previous option, allow for some optional &lt;br /&gt;
properties file (e.g., gmbuilder.properties) to live in an expected location; &lt;br /&gt;
this properties file can then be edited by the user to change the heap &lt;br /&gt;
memory settings, log level, or whatever else.  This way, starting GenMAPP &lt;br /&gt;
Builder remains standardized on the action of double-clicking on &lt;br /&gt;
gmbuilder.jar.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ah, the things we learn when we start downloading and installing our &lt;br /&gt;
software on different machines  :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dondi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:05:21 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net1581c1c1912b7cb68be34d61ffab9b7b854cf9c0</guid></item><item><title>IDs that take the form “ECOK12F050”</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/xmlpipedb/bugs/42/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kam, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please notify me what you would like done with IDs that&lt;br /&gt;
take the form “ECOK12F050”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;
Joey&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joey J. Barrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 23:35:52 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.neteb526174737defda8818580d9330efb949f8295a</guid></item><item><title>Blattner IDs of the form "bxxxx/bxxxx"</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/xmlpipedb/bugs/41/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some Blattner IDs are of the form "bxxxx/bxxxx".  These&lt;br /&gt;
must be split into two entries in the table where the&lt;br /&gt;
other column associated with the entry are replicated&lt;br /&gt;
for each ID.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joey J. Barrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 20:47:07 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netd3f0a6a82a9302ce46cd2e8afe00a40aa7c51aac</guid></item><item><title>X-table to Blattner are not being constructed</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/xmlpipedb/bugs/40/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The X-table to Blattner tables are not being&lt;br /&gt;
constructed.   There is a bug in the species profile&lt;br /&gt;
relationship table generation and should be taken care&lt;br /&gt;
of immediately. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This does not throw an exception but rather it is an&lt;br /&gt;
error of validity from what the user chooses to the end&lt;br /&gt;
product.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joey J. Barrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 20:43:33 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netd242be7c35f45345c89ec89ae5bfa6ef615649ff</guid></item></channel></rss>