devil-linux-develop Mailing List for Devil-Linux (Page 290)

Bugs item #518494, was opened at 2002-02-16 09:48
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=518494&group_id=34096

Category: Build System
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73)
>Assigned to: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73)
Summary: update cdrecord

Initial Comment:
use alpha version (like everybody else) of cdrtools
(new name)
ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix/cdrecord/alpha

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=518494&group_id=34096

Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:

>Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>
>>>The big problem for free projects, who will pay the bill for server,
>>>internet connection, ..... will donations help or do we need to get
>>>commercial?
>>>
>>I see, there is a lot of investigation work to be done.
>>The only way with going commercial, would be to provide services around
>>Devil-Linux. But for me, I don't have that much time to do it.
>>The only "easy" services I see currently see, are the ones I wrote
>>before (selling CDs, providing initial and good firewall rules).
>>On the otherhand, I don't wanna really do it.
>>
>
>But how going commercial with the code being GPL?
>
The only way is to provide services around DL. The code itself should 
stay under the GPL.
When we decide otherway in the future, we can change this whenever we want.
But as I tried to explain, that's absolutely not my goal.

-- 

cu
  Heiko

http://www.devil-linux.org

Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> 
> >The big problem for free projects, who will pay the bill for server,
> >internet connection, ..... will donations help or do we need to get
> >commercial?
> >
> I see, there is a lot of investigation work to be done.
> The only way with going commercial, would be to provide services around
> Devil-Linux. But for me, I don't have that much time to do it.
> The only "easy" services I see currently see, are the ones I wrote
> before (selling CDs, providing initial and good firewall rules).
> On the otherhand, I don't wanna really do it.

But how going commercial with the code being GPL?

-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock

Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:

>>I think for this, we would have to create a organization, to be legal.
>>
>
>As a direct conclusion from above, yes!
>
I was expecting this. :-(

>
>The big problem for free projects, who will pay the bill for server, 
>internet connection, ..... will donations help or do we need to get
>commercial?
>
I see, there is a lot of investigation work to be done.
The only way with going commercial, would be to provide services around 
Devil-Linux. But for me, I don't have that much time to do it.
The only "easy" services I see currently see, are the ones I wrote 
before (selling CDs, providing initial and good firewall rules).
On the otherhand, I don't wanna really do it.

-- 

cu
  Heiko

http://www.devil-linux.org

Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> 
> Gunther Stammwitz wrote:
> 
> >first of all: I like the idea of donations very much. People CAN pay but
> >they aren't forced to. (Paypal would be fine since it's easy to use and
> >fast. A server in a 1U-design for example doesn't cost more than 600 ?uros)
> >
> Gunther you should know this: when a company gives a donation, do they
> need any receipts?

IMO yes they will need receipts.

> I think for this, we would have to create a organization, to be legal.

As a direct conclusion from above, yes!


> >Before we think about changeing the license we have to think about one
> >important question: who owns the devil-linux code. A lot of people have
> >contributed code to the devil-linux community. If we change the license and
> >charge any fees we'll have to ask everyone for his permission, right ?
> >I remember that sourceforge did the same when they changed the license.
> >
> Right. Changing the license is currently the last option for me.
> 
> >We have to make sure that devillinux will be available for free to every
> >private user.
> >
> That's for sure and will never change.
> 
> >The idea of a enterprise-license for companies is not bad.
> >
> The goal is not to make a lot of money (but would be nice), it's more to
> support the project.
> 
> >What about additional alternative models of makeing money: selling support,
> >selling the development of specific modules and consulting and so...
> >
> I was also thinking about this: selling CDs, selling firewall rules, ....
> We can also append the following to the license: when people earn money
> with Devil-Linux (any type of services), they have to donate 10%.

The big problem for free projects, who will pay the bill for server, 
internet connection, ..... will donations help or do we need to get
commercial?

-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock

Gunther Stammwitz wrote:

>first of all: I like the idea of donations very much. People CAN pay but
>they aren't forced to. (Paypal would be fine since it's easy to use and
>fast. A server in a 1U-design for example doesn't cost more than 600 ?uros)
>
Gunther you should know this: when a company gives a donation, do they 
need any receipts?
I think for this, we would have to create a organization, to be legal.

>Before we think about changeing the license we have to think about one
>important question: who owns the devil-linux code. A lot of people have
>contributed code to the devil-linux community. If we change the license and
>charge any fees we'll have to ask everyone for his permission, right ?
>I remember that sourceforge did the same when they changed the license.
>
Right. Changing the license is currently the last option for me.

>We have to make sure that devillinux will be available for free to every
>private user.
>
That's for sure and will never change.

>The idea of a enterprise-license for companies is not bad.
>
The goal is not to make a lot of money (but would be nice), it's more to 
support the project.

>What about additional alternative models of makeing money: selling support,
>selling the development of specific modules and consulting and so...
>
I was also thinking about this: selling CDs, selling firewall rules, ....
We can also append the following to the license: when people earn money 
with Devil-Linux (any type of services), they have to donate 10%.

-- 

cu
  Heiko

http://www.devil-linux.org

Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:

>
>Doesn't that interfere with SF?
>
Yes right, this would mean, that we would have to move the stuff to 
another server.
Wouldn't be that easy, we had for example 12.000 downloads of Beta 5 -> 
12000 * 30 MB = 360 GB in 2 month. :-((

And I don't want to change DL into a commercial license.

-- 

cu
  Heiko

http://www.devil-linux.org

Hello,

first of all: I like the idea of donations very much. People CAN pay but
they aren't forced to. (Paypal would be fine since it's easy to use and
fast. A server in a 1U-design for example doesn't cost more than 600 ?uros)

Before we think about changeing the license we have to think about one
important question: who owns the devil-linux code. A lot of people have
contributed code to the devil-linux community. If we change the license and
charge any fees we'll have to ask everyone for his permission, right ?
I remember that sourceforge did the same when they changed the license.


We have to make sure that devillinux will be available for free to every
private user.

The idea of a enterprise-license for companies is not bad.
What about additional alternative models of makeing money: selling support,
selling the development of specific modules and consulting and so...

If you have a look at Mnogosearch, a free search-engine,
(http://www.stammwitz.de/mirrors/udmsearch/) you'll see that they are
offering the software for free, BUT:
- the windows version consts money
- the user can pay for an installation-service of the software on his
machine
- it might be possible to sell this product as an ASP which runs on the
sellers machine and indexes a customers website.


Bye,
Gunther
-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: dev...@li...
[mailto:dev...@li...]Im Auftrag von
Friedrich Lobenstock
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Februar 2002 14:20
An: Devil-Linux-Developer Mailing Liste
Betreff: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] donations


Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I was thinking about opening a paypal account for donations to
Devil-Linux.
> We would see by this way, how much the people really would really donate.
>
> Another thing I was thinking about,  to do it like Dansguardin (
> http://dansguardian.intmain.com/ ) and give out a download license.
> This means that DL is still under GPL, but companies have to pay a
> certain amount in order to have a valid DL license.
> I was thinking  about an amount between $10-$50 per company and release.
> Personal use and non-profit organizations for free, of course. This
> means it would be an enterprise license for the current release (they
> can install as many servers as they want).
> Active developers would have special rights, of course.

Doesn't that interfere with SF?

> Another thing would be including commercial virus scanners and other
> products. But for this, we would have to provide a commercial and free
> version. But I don't like this idea.
> But I have the bad feeling, that we have to do it, to get there, where
> we want to be.
>
> When we do this, we could eventualy effort our long planned own server
> and other services. What do you think about it?
>
> Does somebody have some knowledge about the tax situation? I'm currently
> living in the U.S., but I'm pretty sure that there will be some issues.

For sure you'll have to talk to a tax expert.

--
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock

_______________________________________________
Devil-linux-develop mailing list
Dev...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop

Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> I was thinking about opening a paypal account for donations to Devil-Linux.
> We would see by this way, how much the people really would really donate.
> 
> Another thing I was thinking about,  to do it like Dansguardin (
> http://dansguardian.intmain.com/ ) and give out a download license.
> This means that DL is still under GPL, but companies have to pay a
> certain amount in order to have a valid DL license.
> I was thinking  about an amount between $10-$50 per company and release.
> Personal use and non-profit organizations for free, of course. This
> means it would be an enterprise license for the current release (they
> can install as many servers as they want).
> Active developers would have special rights, of course.

Doesn't that interfere with SF?

> Another thing would be including commercial virus scanners and other
> products. But for this, we would have to provide a commercial and free
> version. But I don't like this idea.
> But I have the bad feeling, that we have to do it, to get there, where
> we want to be.
> 
> When we do this, we could eventualy effort our long planned own server
> and other services. What do you think about it?
> 
> Does somebody have some knowledge about the tax situation? I'm currently
> living in the U.S., but I'm pretty sure that there will be some issues.

For sure you'll have to talk to a tax expert.

-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock

Hi

I was thinking about opening a paypal account for donations to Devil-Linux.
We would see by this way, how much the people really would really donate.

Another thing I was thinking about,  to do it like Dansguardin ( 
http://dansguardian.intmain.com/ ) and give out a download license.
This means that DL is still under GPL, but companies have to pay a 
certain amount in order to have a valid DL license.
I was thinking  about an amount between $10-$50 per company and release. 
Personal use and non-profit organizations for free, of course. This 
means it would be an enterprise license for the current release (they 
can install as many servers as they want).
Active developers would have special rights, of course.

Another thing would be including commercial virus scanners and other 
products. But for this, we would have to provide a commercial and free 
version. But I don't like this idea.
But I have the bad feeling, that we have to do it, to get there, where 
we want to be.

When we do this, we could eventualy effort our long planned own server 
and other services. What do you think about it?

Does somebody have some knowledge about the tax situation? I'm currently 
living in the U.S., but I'm pretty sure that there will be some issues.

-- 

cu
  Heiko

http://www.devil-linux.org

Bugs item #521940, was opened at 2002-02-23 18:12
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521940&group_id=34096

Category: Configuration / Scripts
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: jftpgw needs user nobody

Initial Comment:
It's not very secure to let it run as root.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521940&group_id=34096

Bugs item #521939, was opened at 2002-02-23 18:10
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521939&group_id=34096

Category: Configuration / Scripts
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: scripts and restart problem

Initial Comment:
Most scripts are not working correctly when called
with the "restart" option, because they have the same
name as the daemon and therefore kill themself.

Examples for this behaviour:
* /etc/init.d/dhcpd
* /etc/init.d/syslog-ng
* /etc/init.d/jftpgw


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521939&group_id=34096

Bugs item #521539, was opened at 2002-02-22 09:47
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521539&group_id=34096

>Category: Base System
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
>Assigned to: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73)
Summary: /var/log/lastlog: No such file or dir

Initial Comment:
After logging in via ssh to 0.5b6

Feb 22 18:38:11 src@gateway sshd[5443]: Accepted
password for root from ::ffff:62.47.41.217 port 1386
ssh2
Feb 22 18:38:12 src@gateway sshd[5498]:
lastlog_perform_login: Couldn't stat /var/log/lastlog:
No such file or directory
Feb 22 18:38:12 src@gateway sshd[5498]:
lastlog_openseek: /var/log/lastlog is not a file or
directory!
Feb 22 18:38:12 src@gateway sshd[5498]:
lastlog_perform_login: Couldn't stat /var/log/lastlog:
No such file or directory
Feb 22 18:38:12 src@gateway sshd[5498]:
lastlog_openseek: /var/log/lastlog is not a file or
directory!

PS: Please create a category for normal bugs, or which
category should I use for such bug reports. I don't
think that any of the current matches.

Greetings
Friedl

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521539&group_id=34096

Bugs item #521919, was opened at 2002-02-23 16:43
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521919&group_id=34096

Category: Package
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: zebra not working

Initial Comment:
needs some fixes

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521919&group_id=34096

Bugs item #521522, was opened at 2002-02-22 09:06
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521522&group_id=34096

Category: Configuration / Scripts
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 9
Submitted By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Assigned to: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Summary: mount_cdrom doesn't find CD-Rom

Initial Comment:
mount_cdrom does not find the CD-Rom in the
following configuration:
 * /dev/hda=harddisk
 * /dev/hdd=cdrom

Changing the order of the harddisk and the cdrom
solved the problem for now, but this is not an 
intended behaviour.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Date: 2002-02-22 18:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=38090

Can't replicate this problem with vmware but restructured
the script, so that might help

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521522&group_id=34096

Bugs item #521522, was opened at 2002-02-22 09:06
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521522&group_id=34096

Category: Configuration / Scripts
Group: None
Status: Open
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 9
Submitted By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Assigned to: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Summary: mount_cdrom doesn't find CD-Rom

Initial Comment:
mount_cdrom does not find the CD-Rom in the
following configuration:
 * /dev/hda=harddisk
 * /dev/hdd=cdrom

Changing the order of the harddisk and the cdrom
solved the problem for now, but this is not an 
intended behaviour.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Date: 2002-02-22 18:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=38090

Can't replicate this problem with vmware but restructured
the script, so that might help

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521522&group_id=34096

Bugs item #521530, was opened at 2002-02-22 09:20
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521530&group_id=34096

Category: Configuration / Scripts
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Assigned to: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Summary: /etc/init.d/dhcpd

Initial Comment:
the current script(just the interesting part):

                        if [ ! -e /etc/dhcpd.leases ];
then
                                touch /etc/dhcpd.leases
                        fi
                        echo -n "Starting $NAME on
$DEVICE..."
                        loadproc $DAEMON -lf
/etc/dhcpd.leases -q $DEVICES


SHOULD be
                        if [ ! -e /etc/dhcpd.leases ];
then
                                touch /etc/dhcpd.leases
                        fi
                        for DEVICE in $DEVICES; do
                                route add -net
255.255.255.255 netmask 255.255.255.255 $DEVICE
                        done
                        echo -n "Starting $NAME on
$DEVICES..."
                        loadproc $DAEMON -lf
/etc/dhcpd.leases -q $DEVICES


Note the route to the broadcast network and the
cosmetic change for the startup message which 
was printing false info.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521530&group_id=34096

no...@so... wrote:
> 
> Bugs item #521539, was opened at 2002-02-22 09:47
> You can respond by visiting:
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521539&group_id=34096
> 
> Category: None
> Group: None
> Status: Open
> Resolution: None
> Priority: 5
> Submitted By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
> Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
> Summary: /var/log/lastlog: No such file or dir
> 
> Initial Comment:
> After logging in via ssh to 0.5b6

Argh SF does stupid formating, here the logs again:
Feb 22 20:59:54 src@gateway sshd[31394]: Accepted password for root from ::ffff:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port 1536 ssh2
Feb 22 20:59:54 src@gateway sshd[31407]: lastlog_perform_login: Couldn't stat /var/log/lastlog: No such file or directory
Feb 22 20:59:54 src@gateway sshd[31407]: lastlog_openseek: /var/log/lastlog is not a file or directory!
Feb 22 20:59:54 src@gateway sshd[31407]: lastlog_perform_login: Couldn't stat /var/log/lastlog: No such file or directory
Feb 22 20:59:54 src@gateway sshd[31407]: lastlog_openseek: /var/log/lastlog is not a file or directory!
 
-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock

Bugs item #521540, was opened at 2002-02-22 09:52
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521540&group_id=34096

Category: Configuration / Scripts
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: save-config should check floppy disk

Initial Comment:
save-config should check if the data that get's written
to the floppy disk is save there. Meaning it should 
check if the data can be read back afterwards (but has
to remount inbetween checking)
.
Just lost whole config because floppy got CRC errors
and because it was during the configuration phase I 
did not make a backup inbetween reboots.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521540&group_id=34096

Bugs item #521539, was opened at 2002-02-22 09:47
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521539&group_id=34096

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: /var/log/lastlog: No such file or dir

Initial Comment:
After logging in via ssh to 0.5b6

Feb 22 18:38:11 src@gateway sshd[5443]: Accepted
password for root from ::ffff:62.47.41.217 port 1386
ssh2
Feb 22 18:38:12 src@gateway sshd[5498]:
lastlog_perform_login: Couldn't stat /var/log/lastlog:
No such file or directory
Feb 22 18:38:12 src@gateway sshd[5498]:
lastlog_openseek: /var/log/lastlog is not a file or
directory!
Feb 22 18:38:12 src@gateway sshd[5498]:
lastlog_perform_login: Couldn't stat /var/log/lastlog:
No such file or directory
Feb 22 18:38:12 src@gateway sshd[5498]:
lastlog_openseek: /var/log/lastlog is not a file or
directory!

PS: Please create a category for normal bugs, or which
category should I use for such bug reports. I don't
think that any of the current matches.

Greetings
Friedl

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521539&group_id=34096

Bugs item #521530, was opened at 2002-02-22 09:20
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521530&group_id=34096

Category: Configuration / Scripts
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Assigned to: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Summary: /etc/init.d/dhcpd

Initial Comment:
the current script(just the interesting part):

                        if [ ! -e /etc/dhcpd.leases ];
then
                                touch /etc/dhcpd.leases
                        fi
                        echo -n "Starting $NAME on
$DEVICE..."
                        loadproc $DAEMON -lf
/etc/dhcpd.leases -q $DEVICES


SHOULD be
                        if [ ! -e /etc/dhcpd.leases ];
then
                                touch /etc/dhcpd.leases
                        fi
                        for DEVICE in $DEVICES; do
                                route add -net
255.255.255.255 netmask 255.255.255.255 $DEVICE
                        done
                        echo -n "Starting $NAME on
$DEVICES..."
                        loadproc $DAEMON -lf
/etc/dhcpd.leases -q $DEVICES


Note the route to the broadcast network and the
cosmetic change for the startup message which 
was printing false info.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521530&group_id=34096

Bugs item #520267, was opened at 2002-02-19 17:25
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=520267&group_id=34096

Category: Documentation
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: include harddisk support in doc

Initial Comment:
From: Friedrich Lobenstock <fl...@fl...>
To: Devil-Linux-Developer Mailing Liste
<dev...@li...>
Reply-To: Devil-Linux-Developer Mailing Liste
<dev...@li...>
Subject: [Devil-linux-develop] HOWTO harddisk support
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 02:12:39 +0100
Sender: dev...@li...
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.17-4GB i586)

HOWTO harddisk support:

1) create _one_ partition on the harddisk you want to use 

   The result ("fdisk -l") should look like this:
      Disk /dev/hdc: 16 heads, 63 sectors, 8126 cylinders
      Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 bytes
 
         Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id
 System
      /dev/hdc1             1      8126   4095472+  8e
 Linux LVM

2) create a physical volume (PV) from the partiton
create in step 1.:
      # pvcreate /dev/hdc1

3) create a volume group (VG) named "devil-linux" using
the PV /dev/hdc1 
      # vgcreate -s 8M devil-linux /dev/hdc1

   (increase the PhysicalExtentSize of 8M to make use
of more than 512GB)

4) now we are going to create the "partitions"
(=logical volumes)
   each is optional, so just create the ones you need

    * swap:
        lvcreate -C y -L 256M -n swap devil-linux
        mkswap /dev/devil-linux/swap
    * log (/var/log):
        lvcreate -L 512M -n log devil-linux
        mkreiserfs -v 2 /dev/devil-linux/log
    * spool (/var/spool):
        lvcreate -L 512M -n spool devil-linux
        mkreiserfs -v 2 /dev/devil-linux/spool
    * squid (/var/squid):
        lvcreate -L 512M -n squid devil-linux
        mkreiserfs -v 2 /dev/devil-linux/squid

5) save your configuration (so you have a least one lvm
backupfile)
      # save-config

Now reboot to test if all logical volumes get mounted
correctly.

Comments welcome.

PS: Because of a mismatch in the sysvinit system no
filesystems
get currently unmounted on reboot. So take care for now.

-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock

_______________________________________________
Devil-linux-develop mailing list
Dev...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Date: 2002-02-22 09:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=38090

Small typo in my last followup

The "-C y" makes the lv swap contiguous, _NOT_ really needed
I guess.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Date: 2002-02-22 09:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=38090

add 4)

* tmp (/var/tmp): 
   lvcreate -L 512M -n tmp devil-linux 
   mkreiserfs -v 2 /dev/devil-linux/tmp

Change the size of the lv's according to your needs.
The "-C y" makes the lv swap contiguous, really needed
I guess.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=520267&group_id=34096

Bugs item #520267, was opened at 2002-02-19 17:25
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=520267&group_id=34096

Category: Documentation
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: include harddisk support in doc

Initial Comment:
From: Friedrich Lobenstock <fl...@fl...>
To: Devil-Linux-Developer Mailing Liste
<dev...@li...>
Reply-To: Devil-Linux-Developer Mailing Liste
<dev...@li...>
Subject: [Devil-linux-develop] HOWTO harddisk support
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 02:12:39 +0100
Sender: dev...@li...
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.17-4GB i586)

HOWTO harddisk support:

1) create _one_ partition on the harddisk you want to use 

   The result ("fdisk -l") should look like this:
      Disk /dev/hdc: 16 heads, 63 sectors, 8126 cylinders
      Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 bytes
 
         Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id
 System
      /dev/hdc1             1      8126   4095472+  8e
 Linux LVM

2) create a physical volume (PV) from the partiton
create in step 1.:
      # pvcreate /dev/hdc1

3) create a volume group (VG) named "devil-linux" using
the PV /dev/hdc1 
      # vgcreate -s 8M devil-linux /dev/hdc1

   (increase the PhysicalExtentSize of 8M to make use
of more than 512GB)

4) now we are going to create the "partitions"
(=logical volumes)
   each is optional, so just create the ones you need

    * swap:
        lvcreate -C y -L 256M -n swap devil-linux
        mkswap /dev/devil-linux/swap
    * log (/var/log):
        lvcreate -L 512M -n log devil-linux
        mkreiserfs -v 2 /dev/devil-linux/log
    * spool (/var/spool):
        lvcreate -L 512M -n spool devil-linux
        mkreiserfs -v 2 /dev/devil-linux/spool
    * squid (/var/squid):
        lvcreate -L 512M -n squid devil-linux
        mkreiserfs -v 2 /dev/devil-linux/squid

5) save your configuration (so you have a least one lvm
backupfile)
      # save-config

Now reboot to test if all logical volumes get mounted
correctly.

Comments welcome.

PS: Because of a mismatch in the sysvinit system no
filesystems
get currently unmounted on reboot. So take care for now.

-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock

_______________________________________________
Devil-linux-develop mailing list
Dev...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Date: 2002-02-22 09:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=38090

add 4)

* tmp (/var/tmp): 
   lvcreate -L 512M -n tmp devil-linux 
   mkreiserfs -v 2 /dev/devil-linux/tmp

Change the size of the lv's according to your needs.
The "-C y" makes the lv swap contiguous, really needed
I guess.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=520267&group_id=34096

Bugs item #521522, was opened at 2002-02-22 09:06
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521522&group_id=34096

Category: Configuration / Scripts
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 9
Submitted By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Assigned to: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Summary: mount_cdrom doesn't find CD-Rom

Initial Comment:
mount_cdrom does not find the CD-Rom in the
following configuration:
 * /dev/hda=harddisk
 * /dev/hdd=cdrom

Changing the order of the harddisk and the cdrom
solved the problem for now, but this is not an 
intended behaviour.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=521522&group_id=34096

Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> 
> do you all agree to do a feature freeze ?
> This would meen, that we finish the currently planned stuff and go ahead
> an release Beta 6.
> When we fixed the bugs of this release, we will release it as 0.5 final.
> 
> Or is there something left, which we have to include in 0.5 ?
> What's about Squid?

OK, add squid and we declare a feature freeze.

-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock