Re: swig

On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, David Margrave wrote:

> I recall reading in the README file for your ldapmodule, that if you had
> it all to do over again you might use swig.   Are you sure about that?
> I've tried wrapping a few things with swig and found that I have to use
> so many typemaps, that I begin to question whether it wouldn't just be
> easier to write the whole thing in C.

perhaps. writing typemaps is like writing C anyway as I recall, so these
would be a similar task.

I would think that the abstractions provided by swig would be a win. maybe
its harder to debug? maybe swig isn't always reliable? dunno. i'm not a
swig expert.

in fact i havent done much for the python-ldap project for quite some time
its been very quiet. so much for open source enthusiasm! :)

maybe after i've shifted house, finished these papers and other work
and other projects that i'm involved in i will find time.... :(

d
--
David Leonard                           Dav...@cs...
Dept of Comp. Sci. and Elec. Engg   _   Room:78-624  Ph:+61 7 336 52447
The University of Queensland       |+|  http://www.csee.uq.edu.au/~leonard/
QLD 4072  AUSTRALIA               ~` '~ E2A24DC6446E5779D7AFC41AA04E6401

This is not SPAM. [...] If you don't wish to receive these messages, you 
should not post at these type of sites.
	- Extract from a spam message ([63.31.76.17] 2000-03-13 07:54:31 PST)