Re: [Sqlgrey-users] couple new user questions

Hi,

Le 27/06/2016 16:55, Karl O. Pinc a écrit :
> On 06/27/2016 09:29:47 AM, Philippe Chaintreuil wrote:
>> On 6/27/2016 9:24 AM, Lionel Bouton wrote:
>>> [...] You are then encouraged to report them here so that I can
>>> keep track of domains which need whitelisting to perform well.
>> # StartSSL hates greylisting -- when verifying domain ownership
>> # via e-mail they expect you to receive an e-mailed code essentially
>> # immediately and will not retry without you restarting the process.
> I confirm this, as of last year.
>
>> startcom.org
>> *.startcom.org
>> startssl.com
>> *.startssl.com
>> # Outlook.com users, retries do not come from the same server.
>> # [2016-03Mar-14]
>> outbound.protection.outlook.com
>> *.outbound.protection.outlook.com
> I concur.  outlook.com is a pain.  They ignore RFC 
> recommendations, spat out several retries immediately,
> and then do not retry again for 30 minutes. (This
> seems to be something that the outlook software does.)

Thanks :

*.startcom.org
*.startssl.com
*.outbound.protection.outlook.com


Added to the public whitelists in the " Requested by MTA admins " section

If I have confirmation of the non-wildcard entries usefulness I'll add
them too.

All users running "update_sqlgrey_config" (either by crontab or manually
will get these new entries).

Best regards,

Lionel