You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
(39) |
Feb
(258) |
Mar
(396) |
Apr
(439) |
May
(337) |
Jun
(351) |
Jul
(296) |
Aug
(205) |
Sep
(328) |
Oct
(174) |
Nov
(252) |
Dec
(172) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(213) |
Feb
(194) |
Mar
(337) |
Apr
(314) |
May
(373) |
Jun
(522) |
Jul
(417) |
Aug
(471) |
Sep
(486) |
Oct
(422) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(299) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(354) |
Feb
(310) |
Mar
(379) |
Apr
(349) |
May
(388) |
Jun
(218) |
Jul
(368) |
Aug
(340) |
Sep
(222) |
Oct
(176) |
Nov
(214) |
Dec
(211) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(221) |
Feb
(187) |
Mar
(190) |
Apr
(211) |
May
(114) |
Jun
(136) |
Jul
(124) |
Aug
(178) |
Sep
(244) |
Oct
(203) |
Nov
(215) |
Dec
(156) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(334) |
Feb
(268) |
Mar
(302) |
Apr
(309) |
May
(192) |
Jun
(288) |
Jul
(273) |
Aug
(215) |
Sep
(318) |
Oct
(347) |
Nov
(226) |
Dec
(265) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(192) |
Feb
(227) |
Mar
(311) |
Apr
(197) |
May
(224) |
Jun
(213) |
Jul
(285) |
Aug
(227) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(209) |
Nov
(169) |
Dec
(174) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(149) |
Feb
(112) |
Mar
(144) |
Apr
(204) |
May
(178) |
Jun
(155) |
Jul
(246) |
Aug
(221) |
Sep
(187) |
Oct
(262) |
Nov
(163) |
Dec
(158) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(256) |
Feb
(318) |
Mar
(307) |
Apr
(237) |
May
(202) |
Jun
(105) |
Jul
(131) |
Aug
(107) |
Sep
(153) |
Oct
(165) |
Nov
(159) |
Dec
(189) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(202) |
Feb
(150) |
Mar
(151) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(115) |
Jul
(103) |
Aug
(150) |
Sep
(141) |
Oct
(187) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(105) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(128) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(92) |
Jun
(91) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(145) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(69) |
Nov
(98) |
Dec
(149) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(44) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(78) |
May
(138) |
Jun
(132) |
Jul
(151) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(107) |
Oct
(168) |
Nov
(88) |
Dec
(94) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(153) |
Mar
(141) |
Apr
(102) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(87) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(67) |
Oct
(84) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(55) |
Feb
(96) |
Mar
(79) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(57) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(68) |
Dec
(61) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(98) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(57) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(48) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(67) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(92) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(34) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(68) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(63) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(26) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(98) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(62) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(25) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(36) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
|
Aug
(17) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(10) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2026 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Joaquim H. <jo...@we...> - 2025-02-18 09:17:52
|
> After the last upgrade, I'm seeing this in a cron e-mail: > 2025-02-18 08:15:02,379 my.host.name proftpd[211366]: processing > configuration directory '/etc/proftpd/conf.d/' > It's only on one server (I have proftpd on a few others) ... and it's > only for that service ... The output is from the monitor.pl script, as run by the configured intervals in "Scheduled monitoring". On that particular service, there are other "monitors" too. -joho |
|
From: Joaquim H. <jo...@we...> - 2025-02-18 07:44:02
|
After the last upgrade, I'm seeing this in a cron e-mail: 2025-02-18 08:15:02,379 my.host.name proftpd[211366]: processing configuration directory '/etc/proftpd/conf.d/' It's only on one server (I have proftpd on a few others) ... and it's only for that service ... -joho |
|
From: Turritopsis D. T. En M. <teo...@pr...> - 2025-01-13 10:04:41
|
Hi, My Postfix service is now working after I restored main.cf and master.cf Postfix configuration files from the backup archive “virtualmin.tar.gz”. I can now receive emails. May I know which other configuration files I would need to restore from the backup archive “virtualmin.tar.gz”??? In case I miss out something. Please advise. Thank you. Regards, Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming Targeted Individual in Singapore 13 Jan 2025 Monday 6.00 PM Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Monday, January 13th, 2025 at 5:36 PM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming via webadmin-list <web...@li...> wrote: > Subject: URGENT help needed with Postfix which stopped working on 11 Jan 2025 Saturday at about 3.00 AM > > SYSTEM INFORMATION > OS type and version AlmaLinux 9.5 > Webmin version 2.202 > Virtualmin version 7.30.4 > Webserver version 2.4.62 > Related packages Postfix > > Dear Virtualmin and Webmin community, > > I have stopped receiving emails since 11 Jan 2025 Saturday at about 3.00 AM. > > I tried rebooting my AlmaLinux 9.5 Virtual Private Server (VPS) and restarting Postfix but to no avail. > > Whenever I try to start Postfix, the service would be killed by the OOM Killer almost immediately. > > Running "systemctl status postfix" shows oom-kill. > > When I checked /var/log/messages, many related services were also killed by the OOM Killer. > > But this is strange. This should not be happening at all because I have 8 GB of physical memory for my VPS. > > But I do notice there were 100+ messages inside the Postfix message queue. Did my email account(s) get compromised by hackers? > > Then I tried uninstalling the Postfix package and reinstalling Postfix from within Virtualmin. > > After doing this, there were no more oom-kill error messages but Postfix is still not working! > > I suspect that all the Postfix configuration was lost after uninstalling and reinstalling. The message queue was also reduced to zero. > > Before flying to Seoul, South Korea on 7 Jan 2025 Tuesday, I had made a backup of all Virtual Servers and all Virtualmin settings on 5 Jan 2025 Sunday. > > Inside the backup archive "virtualmin.tar.gz", I have the following backup files. > > Volume in drive E is Local Disk > Volume Serial Number is 287E-92C9 > > Directory of E:\temp > > 13/01/2025 05:16 PM <DIR> . > > 13/01/2025 05:16 PM 0 filelist.txt > 05/01/2025 10:46 PM 0 virtualmin_chroot > 05/01/2025 10:46 PM 8,615 virtualmin_config > 14/12/2022 04:45 PM 0 virtualmin_custom > 14/12/2022 04:45 PM 0 virtualmin_custom_linkcats > 14/12/2022 04:45 PM 0 virtualmin_custom_links > 05/01/2025 10:46 PM 0 virtualmin_custom_shells > 05/01/2025 10:46 PM 20,480 virtualmin_email > 05/01/2025 10:46 PM 2 virtualmin_mailserver > 05/01/2025 10:46 PM 135 virtualmin_mailserver_dkim > 21/10/2021 08:57 PM 1,679 virtualmin_mailserver_dkimkey > 05/01/2025 10:46 PM 20 virtualmin_mailserver_grey > 22/09/2016 04:09 PM 9,666 virtualmin_mailserver_greyclients > 22/09/2016 04:09 PM 188 virtualmin_mailserver_greyrecipients > 31/12/2024 05:26 PM 30,146 virtualmin_mailserver_maincf > 23/11/2023 02:10 PM 6,408 virtualmin_mailserver_mastercf > 05/01/2025 10:46 PM 20 virtualmin_mailserver_ratelimit > 02/02/2022 01:38 AM 5,592 virtualmin_mailserver_ratelimitconfig > 05/01/2025 10:46 PM 10,240 virtualmin_scheds > 05/01/2025 10:46 PM 10,240 virtualmin_scripts > 05/01/2025 10:46 PM 20,480 virtualmin_templates > 14/12/2022 04:45 PM 0 virtualmin_templates_global > 05/01/2025 10:46 PM 10,240 virtualmin_templates_plans > 05/01/2025 10:46 PM 10,240 virtualmin_templates_skel_0 > 24 File(s) 144,391 bytes > 1 Dir(s) 641,303,912,448 bytes free > > How should I go about restoring the Postfix configuration which was lost after uninstalling and reinstalling? > > Please advise. > > Thank you very much. > > Regards, > > Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming > Targeted Individual in Singapore > 13 Jan 2025 Monday 5.26 PM > > > > > REFERENCES > ============== > > [1] https://forum.virtualmin.com/t/urgent-help-needed-with-postfix-which-stopped-working-on-11-jan-2025-saturday-at-about-3-00-am/131534 > > > > > > > > > > > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list |
|
From: Turritopsis D. T. En M. <teo...@pr...> - 2025-01-13 09:37:08
|
Subject: URGENT help needed with Postfix which stopped working on 11 Jan 2025 Saturday at about 3.00 AM
SYSTEM INFORMATION
OS type and version AlmaLinux 9.5
Webmin version 2.202
Virtualmin version 7.30.4
Webserver version 2.4.62
Related packages Postfix
Dear Virtualmin and Webmin community,
I have stopped receiving emails since 11 Jan 2025 Saturday at about 3.00 AM.
I tried rebooting my AlmaLinux 9.5 Virtual Private Server (VPS) and restarting Postfix but to no avail.
Whenever I try to start Postfix, the service would be killed by the OOM Killer almost immediately.
Running "systemctl status postfix" shows oom-kill.
When I checked /var/log/messages, many related services were also killed by the OOM Killer.
But this is strange. This should not be happening at all because I have 8 GB of physical memory for my VPS.
But I do notice there were 100+ messages inside the Postfix message queue. Did my email account(s) get compromised by hackers?
Then I tried uninstalling the Postfix package and reinstalling Postfix from within Virtualmin.
After doing this, there were no more oom-kill error messages but Postfix is still not working!
I suspect that all the Postfix configuration was lost after uninstalling and reinstalling. The message queue was also reduced to zero.
Before flying to Seoul, South Korea on 7 Jan 2025 Tuesday, I had made a backup of all Virtual Servers and all Virtualmin settings on 5 Jan 2025 Sunday.
Inside the backup archive "virtualmin.tar.gz", I have the following backup files.
Volume in drive E is Local Disk
Volume Serial Number is 287E-92C9
Directory of E:\temp
13/01/2025 05:16 PM <DIR> .
13/01/2025 05:16 PM 0 filelist.txt
05/01/2025 10:46 PM 0 virtualmin_chroot
05/01/2025 10:46 PM 8,615 virtualmin_config
14/12/2022 04:45 PM 0 virtualmin_custom
14/12/2022 04:45 PM 0 virtualmin_custom_linkcats
14/12/2022 04:45 PM 0 virtualmin_custom_links
05/01/2025 10:46 PM 0 virtualmin_custom_shells
05/01/2025 10:46 PM 20,480 virtualmin_email
05/01/2025 10:46 PM 2 virtualmin_mailserver
05/01/2025 10:46 PM 135 virtualmin_mailserver_dkim
21/10/2021 08:57 PM 1,679 virtualmin_mailserver_dkimkey
05/01/2025 10:46 PM 20 virtualmin_mailserver_grey
22/09/2016 04:09 PM 9,666 virtualmin_mailserver_greyclients
22/09/2016 04:09 PM 188 virtualmin_mailserver_greyrecipients
31/12/2024 05:26 PM 30,146 virtualmin_mailserver_maincf
23/11/2023 02:10 PM 6,408 virtualmin_mailserver_mastercf
05/01/2025 10:46 PM 20 virtualmin_mailserver_ratelimit
02/02/2022 01:38 AM 5,592 virtualmin_mailserver_ratelimitconfig
05/01/2025 10:46 PM 10,240 virtualmin_scheds
05/01/2025 10:46 PM 10,240 virtualmin_scripts
05/01/2025 10:46 PM 20,480 virtualmin_templates
14/12/2022 04:45 PM 0 virtualmin_templates_global
05/01/2025 10:46 PM 10,240 virtualmin_templates_plans
05/01/2025 10:46 PM 10,240 virtualmin_templates_skel_0
24 File(s) 144,391 bytes
1 Dir(s) 641,303,912,448 bytes free
How should I go about restoring the Postfix configuration which was lost after uninstalling and reinstalling?
Please advise.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Targeted Individual in Singapore
13 Jan 2025 Monday 5.26 PM
REFERENCES
==============
[1] https://forum.virtualmin.com/t/urgent-help-needed-with-postfix-which-stopped-working-on-11-jan-2025-saturday-at-about-3-00-am/131534
|
|
From: Turritopsis D. T. En M. <tdt...@gm...> - 2023-12-14 13:14:59
|
Subject: Upgrading Rocky Linux Server from version 9.2 to 9.3 using Webmin Good day from Singapore, I have upgraded my Rocky Linux server from version 9.2 to version 9.3 on 23 Nov 2023 Thursday between 2 pm and 2.30 pm Singapore Time. [root@vmi701385 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release Rocky Linux release 9.3 (Blue Onyx) [root@vmi701385 ~]# cat /etc/os-release NAME="Rocky Linux" VERSION="9.3 (Blue Onyx)" ID="rocky" ID_LIKE="rhel centos fedora" VERSION_ID="9.3" PLATFORM_ID="platform:el9" PRETTY_NAME="Rocky Linux 9.3 (Blue Onyx)" ANSI_COLOR="0;32" LOGO="fedora-logo-icon" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:rocky:rocky:9::baseos" HOME_URL="https://rockylinux.org/" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.rockylinux.org/" SUPPORT_END="2032-05-31" ROCKY_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Rocky-Linux-9" ROCKY_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="9.3" REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Rocky Linux" REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="9.3" This is my Webmin slave DNS server in Germany. Enterprise Linux operating system upgrade was done using Webmin server control panel. It is very easy using the Web UI. I am a proud user of Rocky Linux 9.3 and Webmin. I also have a Virtualmin Master Server in Germany as well. Regards, Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming Targeted Individual in Singapore Blogs: https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.com https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com GIMP also stands for Government-Induced Medical Problems. 14 Dec 2023 Thursday |
|
From: Andrey R. <anr...@ya...> - 2023-11-06 17:31:09
|
Greetings, Buchanan!
> Hi Jamie, thank you for responding. I have copied from the terminal 4
> leases from the /var/lib/dhcp/dhcpd.leases file -- the first 2 leases
> (159.218.146.157 and 159.218.147.8) were taken from non-contiguous sections
> of the lease file and are visible when in Webmin I click on the
> 159.218.144.0 network and then click the List leases button. The next 2
> leases (159.218.43.117 and 159.218.42.219) were copied from the same
> dhcpd.leases file and are not visible in the Webmin lease listing. Below
> that I have copied the appropriate sections from the /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf
> file. I can not say exactly when this problem made itself known or what
> change may have triggered it. Thank you for any direction you can give.
It only shows active leases.
Expired leases may be left in the file but they are not useful nor used in any way.
> lease 159.218.146.157 {
> starts 2 2023/06/13 10:56:13;
> ends 2 2023/06/13 11:56:13;
> cltt 2 2023/06/13 10:56:13;
> binding state active;
> next binding state free;
> rewind binding state free;
> hardware ethernet 04:27:28:81:76:ba;
> uid "\001\004'(\201v\272";
> set vendor-class-identifier = "MSFT 5.0 XBOX";
> client-hostname "XBOX";
> }
> lease 159.218.147.8 {
> starts 2 2023/06/13 10:58:30;
> ends 2 2023/06/13 11:58:30;
> cltt 2 2023/06/13 10:58:30;
> binding state active;
> next binding state free;
> rewind binding state free;
> hardware ethernet 00:7c:2d:87:e1:3d;
> uid "\001\000|-\207\341=";
> client-hostname "Samsung";
> }
> lease 159.218.43.117 {
> starts 6 2023/04/08 21:58:43;
> ends 6 2023/04/29 21:58:43;
> tstp 6 2023/04/29 21:58:43;
> cltt 4 2023/04/13 20:06:50;
> binding state free;
> hardware ethernet 50:9a:4c:53:8e:5f;
> uid "\001P\232LS\216_";
> set vendor-class-identifier = "MSFT 5.0";
> }
> lease 159.218.42.219 {
> starts 1 2022/10/03 10:14:07;
> ends 1 2022/10/03 16:14:15;
> tstp 1 2022/10/03 16:14:15;
> cltt 1 2022/10/03 10:14:07;
> binding state free;
> hardware ethernet 6c:2b:59:d2:22:2c;
> uid "\001l+Y\322\",";
> }
> ==========================================
> # #### vlan 42 (WAB)
> subnet 159.218.42.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> authoritative;
> option broadcast-address 159.218.42.255;
> option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
> option routers 159.218.42.254;
> range 159.218.42.138 159.218.42.169;
> range 159.218.42.199 159.218.42.230;
> }
> # #### vlan 43 (Business Students)
> subnet 159.218.43.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> option broadcast-address 159.218.43.255;
> option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
> option routers 159.218.43.254;
> max-lease-time 1814400;
> default-lease-time 1814400;
> range 159.218.43.30 159.218.43.249;
> }
> # #### vlan 144 (VU Streaming)
> subnet 159.218.144.0 netmask 255.255.248.0 {
> option broadcast-address 159.218.144.255;
> option subnet-mask 255.255.248.0;
> option routers 159.218.144.254;
> authoritative;
> dynamic-bootp-lease-length 3600;
> max-lease-time 3600;
> default-lease-time 3600;
> range 159.218.144.10 159.218.144.246;
> range 159.218.145.5 159.218.145.249;
> range 159.218.146.5 159.218.146.249;
> range 159.218.147.5 159.218.147.249;
> range 159.218.148.5 159.218.148.249;
> range 159.218.149.5 159.218.149.249;
> range 159.218.150.5 159.218.150.249;
> range 159.218.151.5 159.218.151.249;
> }
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 6:24 PM Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote:
>> Can you send a sample of the dhcpd.leases file that contains the leases
>> that aren't showing up? The issue may be that Webmin isn't parsing the file
>> properly..
>>
>> On 12/Jun/2023 11:05 Buchanan, Ted <tbu...@vi...> wrote ..
>>
>> I'm running Oracle Enterprise Linux 8.8 as a DHCP server with ISC DHCP
>> version 4.2.6-46 (from the Oracle distribution). I'm running webmin-2.021
>> to help with the administration of this server. Everything used to
>> work/display just fine but suddenly, when trying to list the dynamic leases
>> within a subnet, I get the message, "*The DHCPd lease file
>> /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases does not contain any leases that are active at
>> the current time." *If I click on the List all active and expired leases
>> button, I get the message "*The DHCPd lease file
>> /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases does not contain any leases."* Clearly, when
>> I use a text editor on the /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases file, all the leases
>> exist, new clients receive new IP addresses and existing ones are able to
>> renew successfully. The leases that _DO_ show up are from wireless subnets
>> or subnets not directly connected to our campus. I'm not the only one who
>> administers this server/service so the Webmin module is really helpful and
>> currently missed. Any suggestions for troubleshooting and correcting this
>> issue. Everything in the /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf file agrees with the current
>> operation. Thank you.
>>
>> --
>> Ted Buchanan
>> Senior Systems Administrator - Vincennes University
>> tbu...@vi...
>> <https://us01.z.antigena.com/l/dqUP8cOmul_TMVZ-c9CL53KECB-ktkSzU6E7GaQmZ7q1_NHLLv4ZTeV8IsnrHrzMnDEEC0h9tHVEduNNeXBWbIHDyhRcdRtElIMmRzoFYDIFNp_EwMISYrohLRiFA3HOIGN8Hi6Hwwae~OuP51J5kKF3BmOVOoieCNiSt~j21pCG~GqPQm>
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at
>> web...@li...
>> To remove yourself from this list, go to
>> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
>>
--
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Tuesday, June 13, 2023 18:40:50
Sorry for my terrible english... |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2023-08-29 02:37:26
|
Oh I see, you're using packages and not ports. In that case, what output do you get if you run : pkg search -Q comment glib On 28/Aug/2023 18:53 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Initially, the "make search" fails because I don't use or care about "/usr/ports" except when something strange happens. So I went ahead and did a make fetchindex so it would work, then it just gives a list of 12,300 available programs. So yes, the command as provided returned nothing to start with. From: Jamie Cameron [mailto:jca...@we...] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 6:46 PM To: Webmin users list Subject: Re: [webmin-l] Webmin and Freebsd pkg upgrade Wait, so does the command : make search 'key=.*' | grep glib Not output anything? On 28/Aug/2023 10:48 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Before the grep, it returns: The search target requires INDEX-13. Please run make index or make fetchindex. So, since the index isn’t really necessary to the pkg system, not a useful answer. But for fun… # make fetchindex# grep glib12,300 lines returned. Dave OvertonOwner SYIX.COM530.755.1751 From: Jamie Cameron Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 10:23 PM To: da...@sy...; Webmin users list Subject: Re: [webmin-l] Webmin and Freebsd pkg upgrade You may be right about the version number. If you SSH in as root and run : cd /usr/ports && make search 'key=.*' | grep glib What does it output? On 25/Aug/2023 18:06 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Using webmin on FreeBSD 13.2System Info (Dashboard) says there is a package update.Click it, there are none listedRefresh using the button, still none listed.SSH into the machine: #pkg upgradeUpdating FreeBSD repository catalogue...FreeBSD repository is up to date.All repositories are up to date.< /p>Checking for upgrades (18 candidates): 100%Processing candidates (18 candidates): 100%The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked):Installed packages to be UPGRADED: glib: 2.76.4,2 -> 2.76.4_1,2Number of packages to be upgraded: 13 MiB to be downloaded.Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y[1/1] Fetching glib-2.76.4_1,2.pkg: 100% 3 MiB 1.2MB/s 0 0:03I suspect its the "," in the version number breaking thingsDave Overton, OwnerSYIX.COMdave@syix.com530-755-1751 |
|
From: Dave O. <da...@sy...> - 2023-08-29 01:53:12
|
Initially, the "make search" fails because I don't use or care about "/usr/ports" except when something strange happens. So I went ahead and did a make fetchindex so it would work, then it just gives a list of 12,300 available programs. So yes, the command as provided returned nothing to start with. From: Jamie Cameron [mailto:jca...@we...] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 6:46 PM To: Webmin users list Subject: Re: [webmin-l] Webmin and Freebsd pkg upgrade Wait, so does the command : make search 'key=.*' | grep glib Not output anything? On 28/Aug/2023 10:48 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Before the grep, it returns: The search target requires INDEX-13. Please run make index or make fetchindex. So, since the index isn’t really necessary to the pkg system, not a useful answer. But for fun… # make fetchindex # grep glib 12,300 lines returned. Dave Overton Owner SYIX.COM 530.755.1751 From: Jamie Cameron Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 10:23 PM To: da...@sy...; Webmin users list Subject: Re: [webmin-l] Webmin and Freebsd pkg upgrade You may be right about the version number. If you SSH in as root and run : cd /usr/ports && make search 'key=.*' | grep glib What does it output? On 25/Aug/2023 18:06 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Using webmin on FreeBSD 13.2 System Info (Dashboard) says there is a package update. Click it, there are none listed Refresh using the button, still none listed. SSH into the machine: #pkg upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up to date. All repositories are up to date.< /p> Checking for upgrades (18 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (18 candidates): 100% The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): Installed packages to be UPGRADED: glib: 2.76.4,2 -> 2.76.4_1,2 Number of packages to be upgraded: 1 3 MiB to be downloaded. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y [1/1] Fetching glib-2.76.4_1,2.pkg: 100% 3 MiB 1.2MB/s 0 0:03 I suspect its the "," in the version number breaking things Dave Overton, Owner SYIX.COM da...@sy... 530-755-1751 |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2023-08-29 01:46:01
|
Wait, so does the command : make search 'key=.*' | grep glib Not output anything? On 28/Aug/2023 10:48 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Before the grep, it returns: The search target requires INDEX-13. Please run make index or make fetchindex. So, since the index isn’t really necessary to the pkg system, not a useful answer. But for fun… # make fetchindex# grep glib 12,300 lines returned. Dave OvertonOwner SYIX.COM530.755.1751 From: Jamie Cameron Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 10:23 PM To: da...@sy...; Webmin users list Subject: Re: [webmin-l] Webmin and Freebsd pkg upgrade You may be right about the version number. If you SSH in as root and run : cd /usr/ports && make search 'key=.*' | grep glib What does it output? On 25/Aug/2023 18:06 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Using webmin on FreeBSD 13.2System Info (Dashboard) says there is a package update.Click it, there are none listedRefresh using the button, still none listed.SSH into the machine: #pkg upgradeUpdating FreeBSD repository catalogue...FreeBSD repository is up to date.All repositories are up to date.Checking for upgrades (18 candidates): 100%Processing candidates (18 candidates): 100%The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked):Installed packages to be UPGRADED: glib: 2.76.4,2 -> 2.76.4_1,2Number of packages to be upgraded: 13 MiB to be downloaded.Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y[1/1] Fetching glib-2.76.4_1,2.pkg: 100% 3 MiB 1.2MB/s 00:03I suspect its the "," in the version number breaking thingsDave Overton, OwnerSYIX.COMdave@syix.com530-755-1751 |
|
From: Dave O. <da...@sy...> - 2023-08-28 17:48:30
|
Before the grep, it returns: The search target requires INDEX-13. Please run make index or make fetchindex. So, since the index isn’t really necessary to the pkg system, not a useful answer. But for fun… # make fetchindex # grep glib 12,300 lines returned. Dave Overton Owner SYIX.COM 530.755.1751 From: Jamie Cameron Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 10:23 PM To: da...@sy...; Webmin users list Subject: Re: [webmin-l] Webmin and Freebsd pkg upgrade You may be right about the version number. If you SSH in as root and run : cd /usr/ports && make search 'key=.*' | grep glib What does it output? On 25/Aug/2023 18:06 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Using webmin on FreeBSD 13.2 System Info (Dashboard) says there is a package update. Click it, there are none listed Refresh using the button, still none listed. SSH into the machine: #pkg upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up to date. All repositories are up to date. Checking for upgrades (18 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (18 candidates): 100% The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): Installed packages to be UPGRADED: glib: 2.76.4,2 -> 2.76.4_1,2 Number of packages to be upgraded: 1 3 MiB to be downloaded. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y [1/1] Fetching glib-2.76.4_1,2.pkg: 100% 3 MiB 1.2MB/s 00:03 I suspect its the "," in the version number breaking things Dave Overton, Owner SYIX.COM da...@sy... 530-755-1751 |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2023-08-26 05:22:38
|
You may be right about the version number. If you SSH in as root and run : cd /usr/ports && make search 'key=.*' | grep glib What does it output? On 25/Aug/2023 18:06 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Using webmin on FreeBSD 13.2 System Info (Dashboard) says there is a package update. Click it, there are none listed Refresh using the button, still none listed. SSH into the machine: #pkg upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up to date. All repositories are up to date. Checking for upgrades (18 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (18 candidates): 100% The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): Installed packages to be UPGRADED: glib: 2.76.4,2 -> 2.76.4_1,2 Number of packages to be upgraded: 1 3 MiB to be downloaded. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y [1/1] Fetching glib-2.76.4_1,2.pkg: 100% 3 MiB 1.2MB/s 00:03 I suspect its the "," in the version number breaking things Dave Overton, Owner SYIX.COM da...@sy... 530-755-1751 |
|
From: Dave O. <da...@sy...> - 2023-08-26 01:25:11
|
Using webmin on FreeBSD 13.2
System Info (Dashboard) says there is a package update.
Click it, there are none listed
Refresh using the button, still none listed.
SSH into the machine:
#pkg upgrade
Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue...
FreeBSD repository is up to date.
All repositories are up to date.
Checking for upgrades (18 candidates): 100%
Processing candidates (18 candidates): 100%
The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked):
Installed packages to be UPGRADED:
glib: 2.76.4,2 -> 2.76.4_1,2
Number of packages to be upgraded: 1
3 MiB to be downloaded.
Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y
[1/1] Fetching glib-2.76.4_1,2.pkg: 100% 3 MiB 1.2MB/s 00:03
I suspect its the "," in the version number breaking things
Dave Overton, Owner
SYIX.COM
da...@sy...
530-755-1751
|
|
From: Joaquim H. <jo...@we...> - 2023-08-18 08:54:07
|
Sorry about the off-topic post, but I figured there are plenty of seasoned Linux "root users" here, and even some with Perl knowledge :-) Is anyone aware of a patch, or addition, for pflogsumm that will parse the mail log entry: "Aug 17 01:30:17 myserver postfix/pickup[536842]: 8617517051D: uid=1138 from=<some.address>" If you're using canonical mapping, the sender has been rewritten by the time the entry that pflogsumm parses is written to the log. -joho |
|
From: Joaquim H. <jo...@we...> - 2023-08-16 10:11:38
|
Maybe these can shed some light on what's happening, so it may not be in Webmin "core". https://stackoverflow.com/questions/76875569/warning-mysql-opt-reconnect-is-deprecated-and-will-be-removed-in-a-future-versi https://github.com/perl5-dbi/DBD-mysql/issues/354 If I read this correctly, it's due to an update by Ubuntu for *libmysqlclient* Maybe it's just something for us all to be aware of then. -joho On 2023-08-16 11:05, Ilia wrote: > Hello, > > This is not a Webmin issue. We don't set MYSQL_OPT_RECONNECT anywhere, > I don't think. > > You should check your applications which may call the > mysql_get_option() or mysql_options() functions with this option. |
|
From: Ilia <mai...@il...> - 2023-08-16 09:05:55
|
Hello, This is not a Webmin issue. We don't set MYSQL_OPT_RECONNECT anywhere, I don't think. You should check your applications which may call the mysql_get_option() or mysql_options() functions with this option. On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:48 AM Joaquim Homrighausen <jo...@we...> wrote: > > Getting this, server is running Webmin 2.101: > > > /etc/webmin/status/monitor.pl > > WARNING: MYSQL_OPT_RECONNECT is deprecated and will be removed in a future version. > > > > -joho > > > > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > |
|
From: Joaquim H. <jo...@we...> - 2023-08-16 07:48:15
|
Getting this, server is running Webmin 2.101: /etc/webmin/status/monitor.pl WARNING: MYSQL_OPT_RECONNECT is deprecated and will be removed in a future version. -joho |
|
From: Ilia <mai...@il...> - 2023-08-02 13:49:23
|
Virtualmin GPL, if installed using *virtualmin-install.sh* script also provides Webmin. And, to fix repos just run the command in my first reply. On Wed, 2 Aug 2023, 15:52 Joaquim Homrighausen, <jo...@we...> wrote: > > I'm using Virtualmin GPL (not Pro), and this was after acting upon > Virtualmin's suggestion. > > > On 2023-08-01 22:29, Joe Cooper wrote: > > If you're using Virtualmin, you should be using the Virtualmin repos > > for Webmin updates, not the Webmin repos. > > > > On 8/1/23 07:48, Joaquim Homrighausen wrote: > >> > >> Virtualmin warned that the old repo and/or keys were being used and > >> asked if I wanted to switch to the new repo/key. > >> > >> I responded "Yes". > >> > >> While doing an "apt update", this is the result: > >> > >> > >> W: GPG error: https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository > >> stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because > >> the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 2D223B918916F2A2 > >> E: The repository > >> 'https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository stable > >> Release' is not signed. > >> N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is > >> therefore disabled by default. > >> N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user > >> configuration details. > > > > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > |
|
From: Joaquim H. <jo...@we...> - 2023-08-02 12:53:00
|
That didn't make any difference, but maybe the repo sources are now incorrect: deb https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository stable contrib ? On 2023-08-02 00:29, Jamie Cameron wrote: > Try running : > cat /usr/share/webmin/webmin/developers-key.asc | gpg --dearmor >/usr/share/keyrings/debian-webmin-developers.gpg |
|
From: Joaquim H. <jo...@we...> - 2023-08-02 12:51:12
|
I'm using Virtualmin GPL (not Pro), and this was after acting upon Virtualmin's suggestion. On 2023-08-01 22:29, Joe Cooper wrote: > If you're using Virtualmin, you should be using the Virtualmin repos > for Webmin updates, not the Webmin repos. > > On 8/1/23 07:48, Joaquim Homrighausen wrote: >> >> Virtualmin warned that the old repo and/or keys were being used and >> asked if I wanted to switch to the new repo/key. >> >> I responded "Yes". >> >> While doing an "apt update", this is the result: >> >> >> W: GPG error: https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository >> stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because >> the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 2D223B918916F2A2 >> E: The repository >> 'https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository stable >> Release' is not signed. >> N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is >> therefore disabled by default. >> N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user >> configuration details. |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2023-08-01 22:29:34
|
On 01/Aug/2023 05:48 Joaquim Homrighausen <jo...@we...> wrote .. > > Virtualmin warned that the old repo and/or keys were being used and > asked if I wanted to switch to the new repo/key. > > I responded "Yes". > > While doing an "apt update", this is the result: > > > W: GPG error: https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository > stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because > the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 2D223B918916F2A2 > E: The repository > 'https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository stable Release' > is not signed. > N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is > therefore disabled by default. > N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user > configuration details. Try running : cat /usr/share/webmin/webmin/developers-key.asc | gpg --dearmor >/usr/share/keyrings/debian-webmin-developers.gpg |
|
From: Joe C. <jo...@vi...> - 2023-08-01 20:48:45
|
If you're using Virtualmin, you should be using the Virtualmin repos for Webmin updates, not the Webmin repos. On 8/1/23 07:48, Joaquim Homrighausen wrote: > > Virtualmin warned that the old repo and/or keys were being used and > asked if I wanted to switch to the new repo/key. > > I responded "Yes". > > While doing an "apt update", this is the result: > > > W: GPG error: https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository > stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because > the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 2D223B918916F2A2 > E: The repository > 'https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository stable > Release' is not signed. > N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is > therefore disabled by default. > N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user > configuration details. > > > > -joho > > > > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > |
|
From: Ilia <mai...@il...> - 2023-08-01 14:37:26
|
The fix for this issue is running: *wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/webmin/webmin/master/setup-repos.sh <https://raw.githubusercontent.com/webmin/webmin/master/setup-repos.sh>sh setup-repos.sh* On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 4:05 PM Joaquim Homrighausen <jo...@we...> wrote: > > Virtualmin warned that the old repo and/or keys were being used and > asked if I wanted to switch to the new repo/key. > > I responded "Yes". > > While doing an "apt update", this is the result: > > > W: GPG error: https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository > stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because > the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 2D223B918916F2A2 > E: The repository > 'https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository stable Release' > is not signed. > N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is > therefore disabled by default. > N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user > configuration details. > > > > -joho > > > > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > |
|
From: Joaquim H. <jo...@we...> - 2023-08-01 13:05:10
|
Virtualmin warned that the old repo and/or keys were being used and asked if I wanted to switch to the new repo/key. I responded "Yes". While doing an "apt update", this is the result: W: GPG error: https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 2D223B918916F2A2 E: The repository 'https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository stable Release' is not signed. N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default. N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details. -joho |
|
From: Buchanan, T. <tbu...@vi...> - 2023-06-16 12:27:59
|
Thank you very much, Jamie! That was indeed the fix. All leases are visible. Thank you again. On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 6:13 PM Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote: > Ok I looked into this some more, and found the cause. The fix is here : > https://github.com/webmin/webmin/commit/f27277c4eb7bdb1ba0d4a91890858951601b3faa > > This will also be included in the next Webmin release. > > On 14/Jun/2023 05:42 Buchanan, Ted <tbu...@vi...> wrote .. > > Just for additional information, I have 2 other DHCP servers serving other > specific parts of our network running the same Oracle 8.8, Webmin 2.021, > ISC DHCP 4.3.6 which work fine. Granted they have far fewer devices to > support. > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 1:15 AM Jamie Cameron <jca...@we... > <http://reply_mail.cgi?new=1&to=jcameron%40webmin%2Ecom>> wrote: > >> Thanks for those! Does the 159.218.43.117 lease appear when you click on >> List Active Leases on the main page of the DHCP server module? There's also >> a button on that page to show expired leases as well.. >> >> On 13/Jun/2023 04:59 Buchanan, Ted <tbu...@vi... >> <http://reply_mail.cgi?new=1&to=tbuchanan%40vinu%2Eedu>> wrote .. >> >> Hi Jamie, thank you for responding. I have copied from the terminal 4 >> leases from the /var/lib/dhcp/dhcpd.leases file -- the first 2 leases >> (159.218.146.157 and 159.218.147.8) were taken from non-contiguous sections >> of the lease file and are visible when in Webmin I click on the >> 159.218.144.0 network and then click the List leases button. The next 2 >> leases (159.218.43.117 and 159.218.42.219) were copied from the same >> dhcpd.leases file and are not visible in the Webmin lease listing. Below >> that I have copied the appropriate sections from the /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf >> file. I can not say exactly when this problem made itself known or what >> change may have triggered it. Thank you for any direction you can give. >> >> lease 159.218.146.157 { >> starts 2 2023/06/13 10:56:13; >> ends 2 2023/06/13 11:56:13; >> cltt 2 2023/06/13 10:56:13; >> binding state active; >> next binding state free; >> rewind binding state free; >> hardware ethernet 04:27:28:81:76:ba; >> uid "\001\004'(\201v\272"; >> set vendor-class-identifier = "MSFT 5.0 XBOX"; >> client-hostname "XBOX"; >> } >> lease 159.218.147.8 { >> starts 2 2023/06/13 10:58:30; >> ends 2 2023/06/13 11:58:30; >> cltt 2 2023/06/13 10:58:30; >> binding state active; >> next binding state free; >> rewind binding state free; >> hardware ethernet 00:7c:2d:87:e1:3d; >> uid "\001\000|-\207\341="; >> client-hostname "Samsung"; >> } >> >> lease 159.218.43.117 { >> starts 6 2023/04/08 21:58:43; >> ends 6 2023/04/29 21:58:43; >> tstp 6 2023/04/29 21:58:43; >> cltt 4 2023/04/13 20:06:50; >> binding state free; >> hardware ethernet 50:9a:4c:53:8e:5f; >> uid "\001P\232LS\216_"; >> set vendor-class-identifier = "MSFT 5.0"; >> } >> lease 159.218.42.219 { >> starts 1 2022/10/03 10:14:07; >> ends 1 2022/10/03 16:14:15; >> tstp 1 2022/10/03 16:14:15; >> cltt 1 2022/10/03 10:14:07; >> binding state free; >> hardware ethernet 6c:2b:59:d2:22:2c; >> uid "\001l+Y\322\","; >> } >> ========================================== >> # #### vlan 42 (WAB) >> subnet 159.218.42.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { >> authoritativ e; >> option broadcast-address 159.218.42.255; >> option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; >> option routers 159.218.42.254; >> range 159.218.42.138 159.218.42.169; >> range 159.218.42.199 159.218.42.230; >> } >> # #### vlan 43 (Business Students) >> subnet 159.218.43.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { >> option broadcast-address 159.218.43.255; >> option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; >> option routers 159.218.43.254; >> max-lease-time 1814400; >> default-lease-time 1814400; >> range 159.218.43.30 159.218.43.249; >> } >> # #### vlan 144 (VU Streaming) >> subnet 159.218.144.0 netmask 255.255.248.0 { >> option broadcast-address 159.218.144.255; >> option subnet-mask 255.255.248.0; >> option routers 159.218.144.254; >> authoritative; >> dynamic-bootp-lease-length 3600; >> max-lease-time 3600; >> default-lease-time 3600; >> range 159.218.144.10 159.218.144.246; >> range 159.218.145.5 159.218.145.249; >> range 159.218.146.5 159.218.146.249; >> range 159.218.147.5 159.218.147.249; >> range 159.218.148.5 159.218.148.249; >> range 159.218.149.5 159.218.149.249; >> range 159.218.150.5 159.218.150.249; >> range 159.218.151.5 159.218.151.249; >> } >> >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 6:24 PM Jamie Cameron <jca...@we... >> <http://reply_mail.cgi?new=1&to=jcameron%40webmin%2Ecom>> wrote: >> >>> Can you send a sample of the dhcpd.leases file that contains the leases >>> that aren't showing up? The issue may be that Webmin isn't parsing the file >>> properly.. >>> >>> On 12/Jun/2023 11:05 Buchanan, Ted <tbu...@vi... >>> <http://reply_mail.cgi?new=1&to=tbuchanan%40vinu%2Eedu>> wrote .. >>> >>> I'm running Oracle Enterprise Linux 8.8 as a DHCP server with ISC DHCP >>> version 4.2.6-46 (from the Oracle distribution). I'm running webmin-2.021 >>> to help with the administration of this server. Everything used to >>> work/display just fine but suddenly, when trying to list the dynamic leases >>> within a subnet, I get the message, "*The DHCPd lease file >>> /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases does not contain any leases that are active at >>> the current time." *If I click on the List all active and expired >>> leases button, I get the message "*The DHCPd lease file >>> /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases does not contain any leases."* Clearly, >>> when I use a text editor on the /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases file, all the >>> leases exist, new clients receive new IP addresses and existing ones are >>> able to renew successfully. The leases that _DO_ show up are from wireless >>> subnets or subnets not directly connected to our campus. I'm not the only >>> one who administers this server/service so the Webmin module is really >>> helpful and currently missed. Any suggestions for troubleshooting and >>> correcting this issue. Everything in the /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf file agrees >>> with the current operation. Thank you. >>> >>> -- >>> Ted Buchanan >>> Senior Systems Administrator - Vincennes University >>> tbu...@vi... >>> <https://us01.z.antigena.com/l/dqUP8cOmul_TMVZ-c9CL53KECB-ktkSzU6E7GaQmZ7q1_NHLLv4ZTeV8IsnrHrzMnDEEC0h9tHVEduNNeXBWbIHDyhRcdRtElIMmRzoFYDIFNp_EwMISYrohLRiFA3HOIGN8Hi6Hwwae~OuP51J5kKF3BmOVOoieCNiSt~j21pCG~GqPQm> >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at >>> web...@li... >>> <http://reply_mail.cgi?new=1&to=webadmin%2Dlist%40lists%2Esourceforge%2Enet> >>> To remove yourself from this list, go to >>> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list >>> >> >> >> -- >> Ted Buchanan >> Senior Systems Administrator - Vincennes University >> tbu...@vi... >> <http://reply_mail.cgi?new=1&to=tbuchanan%40vinu%2Eedu> >> >> >> >> - >> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at >> web...@li... >> <http://reply_mail.cgi?new=1&to=webadmin%2Dlist%40lists%2Esourceforge%2Enet> >> To remove yourself from this list, go to >> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list >> > > > -- > Ted Buchanan > Senior Systems Administrator - Vincennes University > tbu...@vi... <http://reply_mail.cgi?new=1&to=tbuchanan%40vinu%2Eedu> > > > > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > -- Ted Buchanan Senior Systems Administrator - Vincennes University tbu...@vi... |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2023-06-15 22:13:24
|
Ok I looked into this some more, and found the cause. The fix is here : https://github.com/webmin/webmin/commit/f27277c4eb7bdb1ba0d4a91890858951601b3faaThis will also be included in the next Webmin release. On 14/Jun/2023 05:42 Buchanan, Ted <tbu...@vi...> wrote .. Just for additional information, I have 2 other DHCP servers serving other specific parts of our network running the same Oracle 8.8, Webmin 2.021, ISC DHCP 4.3.6 which work fine. Granted they have far fewer devices to support. On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 1:15 AM Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote: Thanks for those! Does the 159.218.43.117 lease appear when you click on List Active Leases on the main page of the DHCP server module? There's also a button on that page to show expired leases as well.. On 13/Jun/2023 04:59 Buchanan, Ted <tbu...@vi...> wrote .. Hi Jamie, thank you for responding. I have copied from the terminal 4 leases from the /var/lib/dhcp/dhcpd.leases file -- the first 2 leases (159.218.146.157 and 159.218.147.8) were taken from non-contiguous sections of the lease file and are visible when in Webmin I click on the 159.218.144.0 network and then click the List leases button. The next 2 leases (159.218.43.117 and 159.218.42.219) were copied from the same dhcpd.leases file and are not visible in the Webmin lease listing. Below that I have copied the appropriate sections from the /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf file. I can not say exactly when this problem made itself known or what change may have triggered it. Thank you for any direction you can give. lease 159.218.146.157 { starts 2 2023/06/13 10:56:13; ends 2 2023/06/13 11:56:13; cltt 2 2023/06/13 10:56:13; binding state active; next binding state free; rewind binding state free; hardware ethe rnet 04:27:28:81:76:ba; uid "\001\004'(\201v\272"; set vendor-class-identifier = "MSFT 5.0 XBOX"; client-hostname "XBOX";}lease 159.218.147.8 { starts 2 2023/06/13 10:58:30; ends 2 2023/06/13 11:58:30; cltt 2 2023/06/13 10:58:30; binding state active; next binding state free; rewind binding state free; hardware ethernet 00:7c:2d:87:e1:3d; uid "\001\000|-\207\341="; client-hostname "Samsung"; }lease 159.218.43.117 { starts 6 2023/04/08 21:58:43; ends 6 2023/04/29 21:58:43; tstp 6 2023/04/29 21:58:43; cltt 4 2023/04/13 20:06:50; binding state free; hardware ethernet 50:9a:4c:53:8e:5f; uid "\001P\232LS\216_"; set vendor-class-identifier = "MSFT 5.0";}lease 159.218.42.219 { starts 1 2022/10/03 10:14:07; ends 1 2022/10/03 16:14:15; tstp 1 2022/10/03 16:14:15; cltt 1 2022/10/03 10:14:07; binding state free; hardware ethernet 6c:2b:59:d2:22:2c; uid "\001l+Y\322\",";}========================= =================# #### vlan 42 (WAB)subnet 159.218.42.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { authoritativ e; option broadcast-address 159.218.42.255; option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; option routers 159.218.42.254; range 159.218.42.138 159.218.42.169; range 159.218.42.199 159.218.42.230; }# #### vlan 43 (Business Students)subnet 159.218.43.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { option broadcast-address 159.218.43.255; option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; option routers 159.218.43.254; max-lease-time 1814400; default-lease-time 1814400; range 159.218.43.30 159.218.43.249; }# #### vlan 144 (VU Streaming)subnet 159.218.144.0 netmask 255.255.248.0 { option broadcast-address 159.218.144.255; option subnet-mask 255.255.248.0; option routers 159.218.144.254; authoritative; dynamic-bootp-lease-length 3600; max-lease-time 3600; defau lt-lease-time 3600; range 159.218.144.10 159.218.144.246; range 159.218.145.5 159.218.145.249; range 159.218.146.5 159.218.146.249; range 159.218.147.5 159.218.147.249; range 159.218.148.5 159.218.148.249; range 159.218.149.5 159.218.149.249; range 159.218.150.5 159.218.150.249; range 159.218.151.5 159.218.151.249; } On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 6:24 PM Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote: Can you send a sample of the dhcpd.leases file that contains the leases that aren't showing up? The issue may be that Webmin isn't parsing the file properly.. On 12/Jun/2023 11:05 Buchanan, Ted <tbu...@vi...> wrote .. I'm running Oracle Enterprise Linux 8.8 as a DHCP server with ISC DHCP version 4.2.6-46 (from the Oracle distribution). I'm running webmin-2.021 to help with the administration of this server. Everything used to work/display just fine but suddenly, when trying to list the dynamic leases within a subnet, I get the message, "The DHCPd lease file /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases does not contain any leases that are active at the current time." If I click on the List all active and expired leases button, I get the message "The DHCPd lease file /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases does not contain any leases." Clearly, when I use a text editor on the /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases file, all the leases exist, new clients receive new IP addresses and existing ones are able to renew successfully. The leases that _DO_ show up are from wireless subnets or subnets not directly connected to our campus. I'm not the only one who admin isters this server/service so the Webmin module is really helpful and currently missed. Any suggestions for troubleshooting and correcting this issue. Everything in the /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf file agrees with the current operation. Thank you. -- Ted BuchananSenior Systems Administrator - Vincennes Uni...@vi... - Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li... To remove yourself from this list, go to http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list -- Ted BuchananSenior Systems Administrator - Vincennes Uni...@vi... - Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li... To remove yourself from this list, go to http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list -- Ted BuchananSenior Systems Administrator - Vincennes Uni...@vi... |